Does the "smoking gun" clip seen in the anti-Fox crockumentary tell us something about Carl Cameron? Or does it tell us something about the thieves who made "Outfoxed"?

Our friend CableNewser has a transcript of the "smoking gun" clip that shows Carl Cameron making small talk with President Bush on satellite but off-air. Read it, and then consider these questions...

Was Cameron's wife campaigning? He says she's been traveling around the state and "hanging out" with Dorothy Bush. The narrator says wife Pauline was campaigning, but does the clip say so? Cameron says Dorothy has been campaigning, and Pauline has been "with her".

Cameron goes on to discuss how "To hear Pauline tell it, when she started campaigning for you, she was a little nervous..." Maybe Cameron is talking about his wife; maybe he's talking about Dorothy Bush. It can be read both ways. But this "documentary" has no time for such subtleties as this. They take a position that fits their narrative, and don't bother them with such nitpicky trivia as research, confirmation, or accuracy. What kind of journalism is reflected in "Outfoxed" when something is this easy to nail down, and nobody bothered to do so? (There are more examples of this film's dirty tricks from Howard Kurtz.)

The Kurtz article in the Washington Post quotes Cameron as saying his wife never joined the campaign--a reponse the producers of this film didn't make any effort to obtain. But it's time to play "Let's Assume"...let's assume that Pauline Cameron did campaign for Bush. Unmentioned is this peculiar fact: Greta van Susteren's husband not only campaigns for John Kerry, he is one of Kerry's top fund-raisers. Why is this inconvenient detail not mentioned? Why is it that Carl Cameron is hopelessly "tainted", but Greta gets a pass? (Don't everybody raise your hands at once!)