Newshounds Smear Fox with Doctored Video


The Outfoxed gals are desperate, so now they've stooped to tricky editing to dupe the credulous. With J$P Video!

Sometimes the Fox haters just make it too easy. We're talking of course about the newshounds (another fine product of the Outfoxed mob). In recent days we've caught them lying about Oliver North, and predicting that Fox would not cover the Limbaugh controversy (about on a par with other fearless forecasts from the Newfounland Nostradami). Oh, that last sneered at Rush for defending himself with an "edited clip". The irony of that will shortly be glaringly apparent, as we catch the newspoodles using an "edited clip" of their own to lie about Fox News. Newsmutt lies are part of their stock in trade, but doctoring video is a new feather in their disreputable cap.

It seems like almost every time the biased bassets pull another outrageous con, it's chrish's name that comes up. And so it is again. Carl Bernstein appeared on Fox & Friends, and the "talking points" segment began with Chris Matthews and the upcoming GOP debate. Bernstein defended Matthews, but wait...to chrish that's no story. She wasn't about to print it unless she could put an anti-Fox spin on it. And--surprise!--that's exactly what she did. Yeah, Bernstein defended Matthews, but that so upset the three co-hosts of the show that they quickly changed the subject to shut him up:
(Bernstein) to the three hosts' surprise and discomfort, disagreed that NBC's Chris Matthews was unfit to moderate an upcoming Republican debate. Note the extremely un-artful change of subject.... The threesome tried to get Bernstein to see it their way and when they failed, they couldn't very well cut his mic - he was right there on the couch with them and he is, after all, Carl Bernstein - so they abruptly changed the subject, leaving Bernstein with a "what just happened here?" look.

The curs included their very own grainy clip of the segment, which you may watch here. You can skip ahead to the end because the key issue is where the beagles cut off their video:



Aha! Fox silenced Bernstein by changing the subject to paparazzi! That was enough to convince the gullible kennel-dwellers:
  • "Nyah nah nah nah, enough of this serious talk, lets bring in some fluff lest the viewers start thinking for themselves". Pathetic.
  • At 0:31 her hand goes to her ear. My guess is they are SCREAMING in her ear peice to SHUT THIS GUY UP!!!!!
  • Won't see old Carl on FOX anytime soon!
  • Did you see how disconcerted they looked when he disagreed? Priceless.

But what are the harriers not telling us? The truth: they have been caught using an edited clip themselves! Keep in mind the entire point of their exclusive scoop: the Fox & Friends hosts changed the subject to paparazzi as a way to keep Bernstein from saying anything more about Chris Matthews and debates. We will show you what happened after the point where the doggies cut off their tape. This is the video chrish edited out, the video she doesn't want you to see [QuickTime video]:




No, your eyes do not deceive you. Far from trying to keep Bernstein off the topic, the hosts deliberately brought him right back to that topic, and the conversation continued for five more minutes. But wait? How can that be? Chrish claims they "changed the subject" because they couldn't cut his mic and they had to shut him up. The explanation is simple: Chrish is lying. That's why she edited her little video. If she were to post the entire segment, she would be exposed (again) as a dishonest hack.

Of course when we posted a comment pointing out their editing trickery, it was immediately deleted, and we were banned for injecting truth into the echo chamber. The last thing the Fox haters will tolerate is someone exposing their falsehoods. You can tell the anti-Fox terriers what you think of their doctored video here.

Newshounds: the finest in smears, slanders, and outright lies.

Special bonus youtube edition: Why Do They Lie? Part VI:



posted: Sun - October 7, 2007 at 12:09 AM       j$p  send 

Nelson
[message deleted for rules violation: language]

Edited By Siteowner
October 7, 2007, 1:17:58 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Shane
The leftist in the Old news media are loosing power.When Dictators around the world loose power what happens? A bloodbath! But this bloodbath is funny. I can't wait to see what happens next. Change or DIE! Fox News Rules!
October 7, 2007, 6:58:50 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Fox Fan
The newshounds are a perpetual partisan joke. It's hilarious that they have a tiny following of blinder-wearing nutjobs that believe the trash spewed on that site.
October 7, 2007, 10:12:20 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Susan
Hey J$, I commented over at the hounds site, that they could see the unedited video over here. Hope you don't mind.
October 7, 2007, 12:46:19 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Not at all. I see now that after having been exposed, they're backtracking furiously. Now they admit their first video was edited, but claim they 
"didn't realize" what happened less than a minute after where they cut it off. Just how that could be possible escapes me.
 
Of course their entire point is now proven to be false, but don't expect a retraction or apology. Also note that they don't even know the names of the people on the show! And they claim to watch Fox and know everything about Fox! Why anybody would believe one word that these cretins post is beyond me, but hey, as long as they keep lying, I'll keep exposing them.
October 7, 2007, 12:56:56 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Susan
I think the pooches deleted my comment, without as much as a how do you do? 
Rude Crude & totally indefensible. Guess I made to much sense. 
Or was it the mention of your name?
October 7, 2007, 3:14:19 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Well you had two strikes going against you: 1. you mentioned my name or this site, and 2. you told the truth about the mutts. Either one by itself is toxic to them, but both together? They'll wipe your message out faster than they'll slurp up a bowl of Alpo. That shows how much they fear the truth.
October 7, 2007, 3:16:59 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Llbean
Nice Work Johnny! The Dog Pound over there is another tentacle of the Soros Socialist Society. Spin, Spin, Spinning like a top.
October 7, 2007, 3:47:37 PM EDT – Like – Reply


n15pca
I have it funny how lazy the people on the far left are when it comes to going stuff like this. They still act like they live in a pre-Fox news world and they don't. This is why I love web sites like this and Fox news. They challenge all this lies that this smear sites try to put on Fox news.
 
I fine it funny they have all other cable news channels, regular news, most the newspapers and web sites in their pocket. Outside talk radio and Fox news and they can't stand it.
October 7, 2007, 5:32:08 PM EDT – Like – Reply


tess
I saw it live when it aired. Carl cleaned their clocks. They looked like a bunch of buffoons trying to make him agree with their point of views. Foxhounds saying that they wre trying to change the subject is not that important because when Adam went back to the segment; it still didnt do the friends any good. Bernstein is way too smart and cool to let the friends frame the discussion. The friends just kept digging a bitgger hole. So maybe newshounds got it wrong about changing the subject but the whole segment was priceless. Bernstein made so many good points.
October 7, 2007, 7:04:12 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Yeah well I certainly never said Bernstein didn't make good points. In fact I don't care WHO had the better argument. What I care about is that the newshounds cooked up a phony point about trying to change the subject, and illustrated it with a clip doctored for that very purpose. It's the lying. That's what does 'em in every time.
October 7, 2007, 7:19:38 PM EDT – Like – Reply


StM
The main point of the newshounds post was that Bernstein challenged the hosts' talking points. The hosts didn't do their homework on Matthews because he has also bashed Democrats and defended Republicans. Bernstein held his own against the 3 of them and as the poster above said he "cleaned their clocks".
 
The newshounds didn't cook up a phony point about changing the subject. The hosts DID change the subject to paparazzi in a very abrupt manner so that Bernstein couldn't continue with his Matthew's points. After they came back from the break Bernstein played along and started to talk paparazzi with them but they suddenly changed it back to original subject after someone on the set decided to toss O'Reilly and Hannity at him (which Bernstein also handled very well).
 
I saw the videos on newshounds that showed all of this: Bernstein answering back to the hosts' talking points (before and after the break) and where the hosts changed the subject. No lying on the part of newshounds.
October 8, 2007, 9:07:35 AM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
> The newshounds didn't cook up a phony point about changing the subject.
 
The newshounds claimed that because they couldn't cut his mic, they had to change the subject. A phony point because 1. they could just end the interview if they wanted him to stop talking--he'd already been on for 15 minutes. But they didn't. B. That segment of the show always hits on three water-cooler topics of the morning, so changing topics is part of the format. The hounds of course don't mention that. III: If they changed the subject as a substitute for cutting his mic, they wouldn't after just a minute go BACK to a subject that the hounds claim they were desperate to get away from. But they did. And that's what the hounds didn't mention, and also cut out of their video, because it didn't fit their phony claim.
 
Note: they had the full video all along and only posted the rest of it when this site exposed their editing trickery. 
 
The very notion that they wanted to cut his mic because they didn't like what he was saying is preposterous and ignorant. Here's a clue to the clueless hounds: hosts KNOW what they guests are going to say because producers do pre-interviews with them. If they really don't want someone's opinion on something to come out, they don't ask them in the first place. They asked him because they WANTED to mix it up and get some crossfire going.
 
One of the kennel's Einsteins says, hah that's the last time Carl will ever appear on Fox. Wanna bet?
October 8, 2007, 9:24:27 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Scott
Well the lying mutts are now yelping with a new truther talking point. A Producer yelling in the earpieces to change the subject till they could come up with some kind of stuttering rebuttal to Mr. Bernstein. Ah, proof again the mutts never stop chasing their tail's muchless sniffing their butts. What is it with you mutts? This obession with Johnny Dollar calling you on facts? Free speech is what you demand but you give not to Johhny Dollar or those that enjoy his beat down of you. DELETE, DELETE, DELETE, is the free speech motto of the mutts. Sorry for posting this here Johnny, but we know the mutts or one of their spayed or neutered, hopefully, mutts read the site. We also know that things are deleted faster than BJ's BJ at the mutt site that don't conform to their vision of free speech.
October 8, 2007, 2:29:21 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Daytona
[message deleted for rules violation: language]

Edited By Siteowner
October 8, 2007, 2:52:50 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Daytona
Susan. UNEDITED!!!! Did you watch it.
October 8, 2007, 2:53:22 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
What the mutts don't tell anyone, because it would spoil their latest smear, is that F&F does that at the top of the hour Every Morning. They take two or three topics and do them one after another. This wasn't an "interview" with Carl (that's another hound lie); the interview happened in the previous hour (the mutts don't tell you that). They invited Carl to stay over AFTER the interview and participate in the top-of-the-hour "talking points" segment that deals with two or three topics (the mutts don't tell you that either). That segment ALWAYS moves from one topic to the next and then the next (the mutts don't tell you that either). In fact, by going back to the first topic, the hosts actually gave Carl MORE time on the subject than he would have had, not LESS as the hounds claimed before this site exposed their lie.
October 8, 2007, 4:28:31 PM EDT – Like – Reply


susan
Daytona, yes I watched it. 
What amazes me is the "selective hearing" by the left.
If you were honest, you know that after returning from commercial break, the hosts went over the stories quickly. I believe Page actually said something like, OK, enough of that, let's get back to....
Then continued the dicussion with C.B.
October 9, 2007, 8:03:39 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Daytona
Susan, Why do you think JD didn't run the entire CB section on his post? It's because CB laid out Hannity and Oreilly for being right wing hacks which they are. I caught 5 minutes of F&F this morning and I loved their response to Dan Abrahms about how they do NOT take GOP talking points and how they come out of their own heads. Please tell me you don't believe that garbage.
 
P.S. 18 comments Johnny!!! A new record.
October 9, 2007, 2:22:37 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
> Why do you think JD didn't run the entire CB section on his post?
 
No, the question is why the newshounds didn't run it (until we exposed them that is).
 
You might try checking the category that our posts are made in. The categories are there for a purpose. There is a difference between video that appears in the "slanders and lies" category vs video in the "transcripts and media" category. The latter category is to show extensive clips (within the limits of fair use) for their content. That's where you might find long-form videos. "Slanders and lies" uses video clips for an entirely different purpose: to show where somebody lied about Fox. Hence you get enough of the clip to prove the newshounds didn't tell the truth.
 
See? Two categories, two different types of video clips. I'm surprised I have to keep explaining this stuff.
October 9, 2007, 3:21:12 PM EDT – Like – Reply


smovi
Just saying your name will get you banned johnny I was trying to ask about your website, In the nh fourm and they accussed me of being a spammer,I may be a troll but iam no spammer.
January 31, 2008, 10:44:22 AM EST – Like – Reply