Hiatus


hi-a-tus (noun; pl. hiatuses): a pause or a gap in a series, sequence, or process.

J$P is on the move. As we struggle with the relocation of our corporate offices, we won't be able to do much if any posting for a while. Our hope is that we will be back soon, so Fox haters: don't pop those champagne corks just yet. The rest of you: enjoy the Spring.

posted: Sat - May 5, 2007 at 12:17 PM       j$p  send 

Fox Fan
Let the users take over!
 
"Rabid hounds yelp from the sting of the truth..."
 
"The newsb******, perpetually in heat and suffering from poodle PMS lay yet more lies..."
 
"J$P Audio- A Chavez speech remixed with Howard Dean's 'scream' in agreement with each point..."
May 5, 2007, 5:30:27 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Glen
You guys don't get enough credit. Thanks for providing this service, it's a great site.
May 5, 2007, 8:27:57 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Tom
Give it up, Johnny, you can't convince anyone of your BS. Even Jonah Goldberg thinks you're full of it.
 
Just give it up. Fox only convinces Republicans of its lies.
May 5, 2007, 9:14:05 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Puck
Boy Tom thats really gona make Johnny pick up his toys and go home.
 
Johnny take as much time as you need. We will be here when you get back.
May 6, 2007, 11:53:59 AM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
I'm thinking of adding a fourth category to the blog posts: "What Would Jonah Goldberg Say?" He is, after all, the definitive last word on all subjects under the sun.
May 6, 2007, 3:12:01 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Fox Fan
Goldberg is also an open critic of Fox News. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Goldberg#Fox_News
 
Why would he like a website that disproves (with J$P Video!) lies libelling a network he dislikes?
May 6, 2007, 8:48:10 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ira
FoxFan: Re: Jonah Goldberg.
 
That's a joke son (Tom's most quoted conservative)!
May 7, 2007, 12:36:12 PM EDT – Like – Reply


UhOh
"relocation of our corporate offices"
 
hahaha. Moving out of the parents basement I see?
May 9, 2007, 3:02:04 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Tom
Maybe while you're away, Johnny, you can come up with an explanation as to Fox New's previous obsession with William Jefferson and Mollohan's alleged corruption, but it's complete blackout of coverage of Rick Renzi having his house raided by the FBI in the midst of a corruption probe.
 
Nah, that's silly, you're too busy complaining that Fox isn't do anything BUT covering William Jefferson.
May 9, 2007, 4:34:26 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Tom
You missed it Johnny! Major Garret shilling for the GOP, lied through his teeth and claimed that Congress's approval ratings were due to Democratic support for pulling out of Iraq. Congress's approval ratings have remained the same for months, and Rasmussen clocks the "pull out" segment of America as a healthy 57% MAJORITY.
 
Major Garret, another Republican sock puppet journalist shilling for the GOP.
May 11, 2007, 6:19:05 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Tom, I don't often say this but it wasn't Garrett who lied. It's you. Garrett said NOTHING about pulling out of Iraq affecting the poll numbers. That lie is unique to you. Garrett in fact said the same thing that the AP report itself said: Congress numbers are down due to standoffs and stalemates.
 
So not only did you try to smear Garrett with a lie, you did so in a totally off-topic message. The next one will be summarily deleted, and if you continue to lie and slander Fox people further action will be taken. I don't care why people have hateful obsessions, but I will not continue to permit you to use this site to make up lies to smear somone like Major Garrett, whose years of journalistic accomplishments are not going to be marginalized by Another Tom Lie. Take your lies and smears elsewhere. Oh wait, you already do that. Well you won't be doing it here. GET IT?
May 11, 2007, 8:04:43 PM EDT – Like – Reply


UhOh
"The next one will be summarily deleted, and if you continue to lie and slander Fox people further action will be taken."
 
haha. umm, quick question. What "further action" beyond deleting his posts will you be taking if he continues to make fun of your beloved FNC crew?
May 13, 2007, 3:53:25 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Permit me to explain to you the meaning of words. Tom has often made fun of Fox personnel. As long as it is on topic he gets to have his say. But I was not addressing "making fun" of people. I was specifically addressing smearing people by lying about them. You do understand the difference between making fun of someone and slandering them by telling lies, do you not?
 
This is not Tom's first offense, either here or elsewhere. If he continues to lie about Fox and I catch him in it, further action will be taken. This is another way of saying that you can't come here and just make up stuff to smear people. Clear enough?
May 13, 2007, 6:20:38 PM EDT – Like – Reply


UhOh
No not really, because my question was what do you have the power to do besides deleting his posts? What "further action" do you intend to take? The difference between making fun and slandering is irrelevant, but since that's what you're hung up on, let me rephrase my original question: What further action beyond deleting his posts do you plan on taking if he continues slandering the FNC crew?
May 13, 2007, 7:12:05 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
> The difference between making fun and slandering is irrelevant
 
A fascinating statement, since the basic assumption behind it is that it doesn't matter if you lie or not as long as you are attacking Fox. Well, being truthful may be irrelevant to you, but it isn't to me.
 
> What "further action" do you intend to take?
 
That would be telling. There are a myriad of possibilities.
May 13, 2007, 9:31:39 PM EDT – Like – Reply


UhOh
"A fascinating statement, since the basic assumption behind it is that it doesn't matter if you lie or not as long as you are attacking Fox."
 
lol.. nice try kiddo, but twisting my words around won't get you very far. I meant that the difference is irrelevant to the topic at hand, not irrelevant overall. You attempted to duck my question at first by pointing out that I said "making fun" instead of slandering instead of answering, I pointed out that has nothing to do with my question about what you could possibly do to the other guy beyond deleting his posts. It has nothing to do with that, therefore, in this instance, that is irrellevant. Clear enough?
 
"That would be telling. There are a myriad of possibilities."
 
hahaha. No. There are not any possibilities. What are you gonna do, call in Fox's secret army? Type an angry blog post and hurt his feelings? You're a joke my friend, go relocate to your new "corporate office" and continue making such positive contributions to society.
May 13, 2007, 9:54:23 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Thank you for your comment.
May 14, 2007, 7:00:04 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Fox Fan
Let me get this straight. Tom tries to bash Fox using the favored method by haters, lies and slander. He gets called on it and UhOh comes in to defend him?
 
Tom and UhOh are completely irrelevant judging by their lack of truth, candor, and basic human principles. I would have banned their hate and trash-spewing IPs long ago.
May 14, 2007, 10:51:16 AM EDT – Like – Reply


UhOh
Hate and trash spewing? I asked a simple, and obvious, question: What exactly does Johnny Dollar think he can do to posters that he doesn't like on this board beyond deleting their posts? Rather than answer that simple and obvious question, Mr. Dollar gave me sarcasm and attempted to twist my words around to imply I said something I never said. Is that, Fox Fan, your idea of truth, candor, and basic human principles? I in turn gave Mr. Dollar sarcasm and asked my question again, to which he replied with another "imtimidating" threat about the myriad of possible ways he can hurt others. Fox Fan, is making false threats and flat out lying your idea of truth, candor, and basic human principles? As long as the person spewing the hate, lies, and misrepresentations is a conservative, than the answer is yes, obviously.
 
And Johnny Dollar, you're welcome for my comment, but I'm still waiting for you to answer my simple, and obvious, question.
May 14, 2007, 12:52:28 PM EDT – Like – Reply


JohnE
UhOh: Have you thought about checking with Jonah Goldberg? He might have the answer you're looking for...
May 14, 2007, 2:48:37 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
> he replied with another "imtimidating" threat about the myriad of possible ways he can hurt others.
 
I did? You seem to have a problem with understanding simple English, uhoh, or a problem in describing it accurately. Please quote where I said ANYTHING about hurting others.
 
> I'm still waiting for you to answer my simple, and obvious, question.
 
So you are. I noticed that. Why I should answer you when you injected yourself into a statement directed at Tom is beyone me. Unless of course you ARE Tom. But assuming you're not, why is it your business anyhow? And if all of this was off-topic with Tom, it has to be even more off-topic when raised by some unrequested interloper out to defend the rights of liars.
 
Maybe I'll answer your simple question when you quote exactly where I threatened to "hurt others".
May 14, 2007, 5:07:01 PM EDT – Like – Reply


UhOh
You said if the other fella continued doing something you don't like after you delete his posts "further action will be taken". By this you clearly meant you will cause something negative to happen at his expense. That's what I meant by hurt. I didn't mean physically harm. You know that's what I meant, you can't be that dumb. Stop acting stupid to avoid answering this simple question. The simple fact is you tried to come across as impressive by threatening people on this board, but you weren't counting on anyone questioning you on this. Now that I have questioned you you're doing everything you possibly can to act like you either don't understand me or to take my words out of context to imply I'm saying things I didn't say rather than answer for yourself. Now that you dug the hole deeper by informing us that not only do you have some magical way of punishing anonymous people who disagree with your opinions over the internet, but you in fact have an entire "myriad" of these threatening abilities, I think it only makes sense that you tell us what they are. Or at least admit that you're full of it. No more pretending not to follow this simple conversation. And by the way, this is a forum (in fact, one that you yourself started) that is open to the public. Attacking people with bogus threats and then throwing a temper tantrum when someone else makes a comment or asks a question about it doesn't fly, whether that person was part of the original conversation or not. I originally asked this question more as a joke than anything, knowing full well that you're merely yet another immature person trying to come across as impressive while hiding behind the protection of your computer, but you're putting so much effort into finding ways to avoid such a perfectly understandable question that now I would really like to know what you have to say. If you're going to threaten people who visit your website with "further action", your visitors are perfectly within their right to ask what exactly these actions are. So, now that you understand, you can answer, or admit you're lying (which would make you a guy who dedicates so much of his life to "exposing" lies and from others and then does it himself , not good).
May 14, 2007, 5:35:45 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
> your visitors are perfectly within their right to ask what exactly these actions are
 
And I'm perfectly within my rights to tell interlopers it's none of their business. Your entire argument is insipid, off-topic, and irrelevant. And if you truly insist that you cannot possibly imagine ANY actions I could take other than deleting a message...well, that tells me a lot. I can come up with three "further actions" I could take just off the top of my head. If that is a puzzling, impenetrable brain-teaser to you, then perhaps you should frequent some website that functions at a more elementary level.
May 14, 2007, 6:16:50 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Fox Fan
Why are you so paranoid for Tom UhOh? johnny said he'd take further action. This could take a myriad of forms, the most likely being temporary or permanent banning. Slightly more personal would be to submit an abuse report with Tom's IP address to Tom's ISP.
 
The worst thing johnny could do is send the secret Fox News Republican Guard Thought Police to Tom's house to bring him to a joycamp. 
May 14, 2007, 6:52:12 PM EDT – Like – Reply


UhOh
"Yeah! Those are good examples Fox Fan! That's what I was thinking all along!" Thinks Johnny Dollar to himself. Good thing someone else was here to speak for you and get you out of your own mess, eh pal? 
 
I'm not paranoid for Tom, I never said anything about Tom, I was just curious as to what Johnny Dollar was referring to when he made his threats. If you take a stroll down memory lane and read the posts you will see he immediately went into attack mode when I dared question him, and hence began the fun. The response you gave is as perfectly simple as the question was, and if that's what Johnny meant by his intimidations logically he would have said so from the beginning. There is absolutely no logical reason why he would be so determined to avoid answering such an innocent question that he would have to feverishly resort to hurling insults and lies and slander unless he was full of it from the begining (oh that's right I'm an interloper, THAT explains it!). Of course that will be denied but I think anyone with a functioning brain can read this thread and put two and two together. Well I'm starting to feel like a bully picking on such an incapable person so I'm done here. It was fun guys!
May 14, 2007, 8:08:34 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Fox Fan
"Yeah! Those are good examples Fox Fan! That's what I was thinking all along!" Thinks Johnny Dollar to himself.
 
Why belittle johnny when you were the one who had to be told what he knew all along? As if he hadn't talked about the same things time and time again in the past. You may not have specifically said anything about Tom, but you did interject into a topic between johnny and Tom -in comment #12- and again in 14, 16, 19, et al where you "challenged" johnny with a "quick question" about his reponse to Tom. 
 
Good riddance.
May 14, 2007, 8:27:33 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Email: Hey Tom, they ganged up on me. What's more, he wouldn't tell me what his game plan was. I tried all the insults I could think up too, but he wouldn't crack. Sorry I failed on the intel mission. I don't want to go back there. They don't play with my rules--they have their own. I don't like that. You'll have to find someone else. Sorry. U.O.
May 14, 2007, 9:15:24 PM EDT – Like – Reply


UhOh
I know I said I'm done here but I'm bored I feel like pointing out some more stupidity so I guess I'm not gone just yet. First of all, Fox Fan, I have to say this is the first time I've come across a public message board where it is forbidden for new people to join in on a conversation between others. Since both you and Johnny Dollar keep using the fact that this started out as a conversation between JD and Tom as the reason for why my question was so horrendously uncalled for that it was deemed absolutely necessary and understandable that I be attacked that rule must be the case around here. Kind of sounds like you guys can't take being called out on the things you say, doesn't it? And of course, since you interjected yourself into this conversation I guess you broke your own cardinal rule so you're really in no position to use that excuse. And by your own logic since you joined in you must be "paranoid for Johnny". Hmm.
 
I also didn't "challenge" Johnny with anything. I asked him a question. I see you subscribe to the same spin/lie/slander when all else fails rule that Johnny does? Big shock there. And I noticed you put "quick question" in quotes as if it wasn't a quick question, when it wasn't anything but. Tsk tsk.
 
And to think, if Johnny Dollar simply gave a short response to my question or even gave me a sarcastic remark rather than throwing childish insults and lying you guys wouldn't have me here pointing out the hypocricy of the fact that a site that claims to expose lies and slander is run by and frequented by people who do nothing but lie and slander. And to think, it was such a simple question. Ah well. Keep up the good work!
May 14, 2007, 9:50:59 PM EDT – Like – Reply


UhOh
Ok ok but this time I'm really gone so feel free to slip in those last words you almost had last time.
 
Once again, it was fun guys!
May 14, 2007, 10:02:46 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Fox Fan
As J$ says, thank you for your comment.
May 14, 2007, 10:06:58 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Fox Fan
Oh, and such an innocent victim you are. When you come to a site and insult the host it's generally fair game for you to be skewered.
 
First comment:
""relocation of our corporate offices"
hahaha. Moving out of the parents basement I see?
UhOh | 05.09.07 - 3:07 pm"
 
Just above here:
"First of all, Fox Fan, I have to say this is the first time I've come across a public message board where it is forbidden for new people to join in on a conversation between others."
 
Where should we be sending the condolences cards?
May 14, 2007, 10:51:46 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Yeah, that's how everyone who is merely seeking information introduces themself on a message board: by ridiculing and insulting the administrator! You nailed him, FF.
May 14, 2007, 11:04:48 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Tom
Actually, Johnny, you flat out lied through your teeth, just like Garrett. Garrett connected Congress's approval rating dip with the pullout plan. That is a matter of fact. Dig up the transcript or find a video clip for yourself. Otherwise, you're as much of a fraud as Garrett is.
May 14, 2007, 11:47:36 PM EDT – Like – Reply


UhOh
Oh I'm sorry guys, I should have known better than to make a single sarcastic comment when so many sensitive little boys are in the room. I didn't mean to hurt your feeling Johnny honestly I swear That explains your outrageous response to my question, your feelings were hurt You nailed me Fox Fan, you nailed me
May 15, 2007, 12:06:39 AM EDT – Like – Reply


UhOh
P.S. Anyone else notice this is the second time in this one conversation that Johnny needed Fox Fan to come up with a defense that at least makes half sense? Maybe the wrong guy is running this joint.
May 15, 2007, 12:09:00 AM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Tom, I didn't need a transcript. I had the report on my tivo, so I know exactly what Garrett said. Of course you can get a transcript if you want to know the truth, but that concept is almost laughable. Instead you repeat your prevous lie with more personal attacks and name calling. Just remember, you were warned.
May 15, 2007, 12:33:52 AM EDT – Like – Reply