'He Looked Like What He Is: A Newcomer'


J$P Audio! Chris Wallace joins Kirsten Powers and Brian to assess the Democratic debate.



From Brian and the Judge, April 27 2007:

Chris talks with Brian Kilmeade and Kirsten (subbing for the Judge) about the debate, the correspondent's dinner, and more [mp3 audio]:


posted: Fri - April 27, 2007 at 11:11 AM       j$p  send 

Toyomi Karita
Oh - they talked about the debate? I thought they were changing their format to bi*ch about "Rosie O'Donnell" 24X7.
 
Let me guess. They were hypercritical of all the Democratic candidates and didn't like any of them. Right?
April 28, 2007, 9:44:12 AM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Thank you for your guess, BIOR. But here's a friendly suggestion. Instead of guessing about what's in a clip and basing your criticism on your guess, try something new. Did you ever think of listening to the clip and THEN bashing what's in it? Oh I know it's just so burdensome to actually spend nine minutes to hear something before you sound off on it. But it's possible that some people might just think more of a criticism based on truth rather than criticism based on a bad guess. Just a friendly suggestion from J$P, because we're looking out for you.
April 28, 2007, 1:32:50 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Toyomi Karita
[message deleted for rules violation: language]

Edited By Siteowner
April 28, 2007, 6:45:39 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Toyomi Karita
Hahahaha... what "language violation"? The term "el suck-o"???? You're really reaching on that one, Johnny. You've just lost all credibility. 
 
I'm 100% spot on, so you copped out, deleted my post, and blew your "language foul" whistle. That, and you no likey those survey results, the second recent survey (U of MD being the first) to basically verify that people who get their news from Fox "News" are woefully misinformed. Kinda blows your whole schtick - eh? (But there might have been some bias in the questions asked. Had the survey been about "Rosie O'Donnell" Fox "News" watchers would have scored much, much higher...) 
 
Shame there's no "intellectually dishonest" edit a poster can apply...
 
If anyone happens to peruse this post, note that Johnny deleted my previous due to an alleged "language violation" due to the term "el suck-o". 
 
Sad.
April 28, 2007, 8:16:16 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Your message was deleted for breaking the rules on language. The notion that it was because "el-sucko" is "foul" language is purely your own invention. Foul language was not the violation in question.
April 28, 2007, 8:25:35 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Toyomi Karita
By the way, you are hereby banned from ever claiming that NH is "intellectually dishonest" or any variation thereof after your last deletion of my post. 
 
Hahahahahaha - 
 
You "el suck-o".
April 28, 2007, 8:26:15 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Toyomi Karita
[message deleted for rules violation: language]
 
Edited By Siteowner
Toyomi Karita | 04.28.07 - 6:50 pm | #
 
The only profanity used in that post was the term "el suck-o". Was the "language violation" the fact that the language contained "logic"?
April 28, 2007, 8:28:14 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Toyomi Karita
[message deleted for rules violation: language]

Edited By Siteowner
April 28, 2007, 8:33:00 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
The rules as to language are quite clear. Either you didn't read them, or you did read them and deliberately used language that you knew would get your post deleted. That ain't my fault.
 
Now you say you were posting about some sort of survey? If you say so. Sounds like if I had gotten that far I would have deleted it for being off-topic, because I have NO idea what connection any survey has to this article.
April 28, 2007, 8:35:10 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Toyomi Karita
Your should add the following to your "Terms of Use":
 
[I]No logic shall be used in any argument, especially if I can't defend against it. Such posts will be deleted immediately by the siteowner.[/I]
 
Kiri, kiri, kiri...
April 29, 2007, 11:23:43 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Toyomi Karita
'He Looked Like What He Is: A Newcomer'
---
 
Think they'll say the same thing about Mitt Romney? My guess is they'll be "quite impressed" by that particular newcomer. Question is, do Fox News viewers even know who Mitt Romney is with all their cheap-mindles- supermarket checkout tabloid level claptrap about "Rosie O'Donnell" and "Alec Baldwin"? 
 
They'll wait till closer to the election to tell their viewers to "run along now, and go vote to Mitt Rmoney..." ...the remaining conservative bobbleheads will "blissfully" comply. 
 
Pew Survey Finds Most Knowledgeable Americans Watch 'Daily Show' and 'Colbert'-- and Visit Newspaper Sites
 
"...bringing up the rear were regular watchers of Fox News. Only 1 in 3 could answer 2 out of 3 questions correctly."
http://mirroronamerica.blogspot.com/2007/04/fox-viewers-least-informed-according-to.html
 
Some "news" channel you cheer lead for, thar, Jawwwwwny.
April 29, 2007, 12:29:27 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Toyomi Karita
They'll wait till closer to the election to tell their viewers to "run along now, and go vote to Mitt Rmoney..." ...the remaining conservative bobbleheads will "blissfully" comply.
 
ADD: due to that little "attention span" problem of their viewers
 
Kiri, kiri, kiri...
April 29, 2007, 12:31:12 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ira
Toyomi Karita; First off you and Tom ought to find some new material: the so-called University of Maryland study and Gibson's out-of-context comment on birth rates have been previously discussed, and dubunked on this website.
 
Second, you are the second Fox hater I have read that mentions this Pew study but only produces an Editor and Publisher story. 
 
Specifically what were these "2 out of 3 questions" that Fox Viewers are too stupid to answer?
April 29, 2007, 2:13:22 PM EDT – Like – Reply