'As Unsettled a Situation as I've Seen in All My Years'


J$P Audio! Bob Beckel gives Democratic reaction to the GOP debate, and analyzes the 2008 field.



From Brian and the Judge, September 6 2007:

Judge Andrew Napolitano and Brian Kilmeade talk with Bob Beckel:



Link for audio only [mp3]:




posted: Thu - September 6, 2007 at 11:32 AM       j$p  send 

Fooyou
Probabl edited to make the Dem. Look worse. Fox has a history of that.
 
See the following:
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGqPxn7njqM&mode=related&search=
September 6, 2007, 3:55:59 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Yeah what's your evidence that this clip is edited? Oh you don't have any? Oh, all you have is a nitwit who found an eeevil conspiracy in shortening a clip from Stephen Colbert, a comedy show? What exactly does that have to do with having someone in the studio for a live interview? How exactly would the eeevil Fox manage to edit that? Bend the space-time continuum, perhaps?
 
I know the only reason you even posted was to troll for some more hits on that incredibly silly example of "bias" you are touting. So I don't really expect an answer. But thank you for playing.
September 6, 2007, 4:49:49 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Tom
[Message deleted for rules violation: off-topic]

Edited By Siteowner
September 6, 2007, 9:57:21 PM EDT – Like – Reply


olbyhater
horribly boring.... and long.
September 7, 2007, 2:56:52 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Tom
[message deleted for rules violation: off-topic]

Edited By Siteowner
September 7, 2007, 7:01:56 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Tom
Oh yeah, here's a fact that Johnny Dollar doesn't like to talk about it, and it is ON TOPIC. Notice how most of the time Johnny posts these threads trying to claim that Fox is balanced by offering a Democratic perspective, that they're mostly audio links to Democratic strategists or people who aren't Democrats deviating from the REpublican line on Fox News RADIO?
 
Notice that? Who the hell cares about "Fox News Radio". When we talk about Fox News, we're talking about the actual channel. So why is it that Johnny has to resort to putting up threads with people on the radio instead of on the actual news channel?
 
Well, maybe because FOX NEWS ALMOST NEVER DOES ONE ON ONE INTERVIEWS WITH DEMOCRATS ON TELEVISION. Period. Hannity and Colmes certanly don't. Last night they had four consecutive REpublicans on, and no Democrats at all. O'Reilly is probably the only one who does because he despises Democrats. Cavuto doesn't, Gibson certainly doesn't, Brit Hume blacklists liberals and Democrats from his debate panel and Fox & Friends similarly do not invite solo Democrats on. And obviously the same goes for John Kasich, Paul Gigot, Greg Gutfeld or Hannity (on Hannity's America).
 
So naturally Johnny has to resort to scrounging around on Fox News radio.
September 7, 2007, 7:07:48 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ira
He baaack!
 
Crazier than ever!
September 7, 2007, 7:59:47 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Tom you lied about Fox & Friends, you lied about Hannity, and you lied about Gutfeld, whose program has WAY more Dems and libs than Republicans on it. I call your statements lies. I'll give you 24 hours to show otherwise.
September 7, 2007, 8:23:06 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ira
Johnny: And he also lied about "Special Report With Brit Hume." 
 
Tom conveniently doesn't mention that earlier this week the Brit Hume panel consisted of Jeff Birnbaum, Nina Easton and Mort Kondrake.
 
So where was the conservative?
 
And once again the dishonest Tom mentions Greg Gutfeld who does a comedy, not political show.
September 8, 2007, 12:47:59 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Tom
"Tom you lied about Fox & Friends, you lied about Hannity, and you lied about Gutfeld, whose program has WAY more Dems and libs than Republicans on it."
 
Oh, I'm lying huh? Why don't you prove it? Gutfeld doesn't have liberals on his show, Fox & Friends do not have liberals or Democrats for one on one interviews either. The only Democrat interviewed on Fox & Friends recently was Senator Levin when Kilmeade picked a fight with him, as all three hosts were antagonistic. You're flat out lying through your teeth.
 
I also think it's funny that you're basically admitting I'm right, because you're only trying to claim I'm wrong about three of those shows. Notice how Johnny didn't claim I was lying about Cavuto, Gibson, Hume, H&C, Kasich or Gigot's show?
 
Know why? Because he knows he doesn't have a chance in hell of finding a video clip of a one-on-one interview with a Democrat on any of those shows. One of them is a former Republican congressman, after all, and another is the editor of the WSJ editorial page. Fat chance.
 
So, congratulations, Johnny, you're admitting I'm right about 70% of what I said, and you're trying to prove me wrong on the other 30% without offering any actual proof.
September 8, 2007, 1:25:44 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
> Gutfeld doesn't have liberals on his show
 
Let's see: Rachel Sklar, Bill Schulz, Laura Schwartz, Fark.com, Michael Musto, Jane Fleming, Julia Allison, Billy West, Will Durst, Mark Lamont Hill, Ellis Henican, Cheech Marin, Dennis Kucinich etc. There are more liberals on Red Eye in a week than there are conservatives on Countdown in a year. So we have Tom lie #1.
 
>F ox & Friends do not have liberals or Democrats for one on one interviews either
 
Was that Joe Biden I saw on there the other day? Tom lie #2.
 
> Notice how Johnny didn't claim I was lying about Cavuto, Gibson, Hume, H&C, Kasich or Gigot's show?
 
Cavuto: let's see, Dennis Kucinich, Charlie Rangel, Kinky Friedman, George Soros--we'll call that Tom lie #3. Hume: doesn't do one-on-one inteviews. Kasich: doesn't even have a show (Tom is really well-informed!). Gigot: How about Rahm Emanuel? What are we up to now, Five Tom lies? Six? Oh and Gibson? Laura Schwartz. Kucinich, Sandy Berger. Al Sharpton, Bill Richardson, Terry McAuliffe... Seven, eight, nine, ten lies?
 
So yes, you are lying Tom, as you do regularly here, and the other places you circulate. You couldn't document one single claim you made because they were all made up. So your best bet now to preserve your options would be to admit that you were wrong, wrong, and wrong again. Not doing so would simply confirm what many suspect, that you deliberately do not tell the truth.
September 8, 2007, 2:12:31 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Tom
Johnny, every single claim you just made was a flat out lie. Gutfeld does not have Schwartz, or Hennican on his show. The only Democrat I've ever seen on his show was Kucinich, on a SINGLE interview. Similarly, Fox and Friends do not have individual Democrats on their show for one on one interviews, you're lying about Biden. Gibson, likewise, does not have Schwartz or other Democrats on his show for one on one interviews, you're lying.
 
As for Rangel or Kucinich on Cavuto, he hasn't had them on for months, literally months. He doesn't do one on one interviews with Democrats. He only brought on Rangel after Democrats won control of congress.
 
So no, you are, in fact, lying.
September 8, 2007, 2:59:13 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Tom
By the way, Johnny, what I love most about your hypocrisy and the hypocrisy of idiots like Brent Bozell is that if Nancy Pelosi narrated a documentary for CNN on abortion or gay rights, you'd scream at the top of your lungs like a bunch of schoolchildren about liberal bias.
 
But when NEwt Gingrich narrates solo documentaries on Fox News about things like the Separation of Church and State, you're suddenly silent.
 
Because, well, that's not biased AT ALL. LoL.
September 8, 2007, 3:02:36 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Tom, I gave you the chance to come clean, but you chose to compound one set of lies with another. To wit:
 
> Gutfeld does not have Schwartz, or Hennican on his show.
 
Henican:
http://tinyurl.com/2l3wz2
 
Laura Schwartz (she's been on at least a half dozen times!):
http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/04/06/red-eye-review/#comment-30765
http://tinyurl.com/2xynum
 
> you're lying about Biden
 
Hahahaaaa! This is just too easy:
 
http://tinyurl.com/2shblv
 
> Gibson, likewise, does not have Schwartz
 
http://tinyurl.com/2cpkc7
 
> or other Democrats on his show for one on one interviews
 
http://tinyurl.com/24549m
http://tinyurl.com/2vxdp7
http://tinyurl.com/34sz2n
 
Need I go on? Tom, you could have done the honorable thing. You could have been a man and said you were wrong. But that would require that you be honest. It's clear that your only intent here is to spread lies and disinformation. Instead of telling the truth, you spread more lies. You doubled down with a losing hand. And that was your decision, not mine.
September 8, 2007, 3:13:39 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ira
And last week, "Redeye" had brain-fried Tommy Chong on the show sporting an anti-Bush T-shirt that might even look good on brain-fried Tom!
September 8, 2007, 4:17:14 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
No, Ira, you must be lying. "Tom" said they don't allow liberals on "Red Eye". And "Tom" never lies. /sarcasm
September 8, 2007, 4:26:01 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Fox Fan
That was the best Tom beatdown I've ever seen here, and I've seen a lot of Tom beatdowns in these comment threads. 
 
It's a lot easier to simply say that something didn't happen than to prove that it did. Good work johnny!
September 9, 2007, 12:35:25 AM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Heh, thank you. There won't need to be any Tom beatdowns here for a while. He's going on a temporary hiatus for a bit.
September 9, 2007, 1:02:27 AM EDT – Like – Reply


fooyou
[message deleted for rules violation: language]

Edited By Siteowner
September 10, 2007, 9:43:40 PM EDT – Like – Reply


olbyhater
johnny dollar's place is getting to be popular...
 
thx kooks for visiting!
September 10, 2007, 11:41:08 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Fox Fan
Pathetic. Tom gets beat down and calls on some other newsb**** to save face.
 
It's too bad that the replacement is just as bad as the preceding failure.
 
Oh no! Fox edits clips! I'll admit that much is true, fooyou.
 
The difference between Fox News and Micheal Moore/Robert Greenwald is that Fox News edits clips to show what really happened. Moore/Greenwald edit clips to HIDE what really happened.
 
Who is more recognized for newsworthiness? Hint: It's not Moore or Greenwald.
September 10, 2007, 11:49:20 PM EDT – Like – Reply