Muzzling Mosul?Tis the season to needle FNC. But first get the facts straight.
When the cable news channels got word of a bomb attack in Mosul, TVNewser
loved CNN, not so much Fox. His article is called "A Tale of Two Channels". (I
thought there were three cable news channels.) Be that as it may, TVN
writes:
During the 9am hour, CNN went wall-to-wall with coverage of the Mosul attacks, while FNC and MSNBC seemed to ignore it.... Fox mentioned the attack, then reported on a study about shopping mall parking. Let's go to the tivo: 9:00 am: Live Fox News Alert from Bret Baier about the attack. 9:02 am: Shopping mall parking report? No, David Piper's live report from Iraq on Blair's visit. 9:03 am: Report on attacks on oil pipeline and Iraqi scientist. 9:04 am: Now the shopping mall report? No, this time it's a live report from Kelly Wright about the Rumsfeld controversy. 9:06 am: Reports on Presidential visit to hospitals, drug warnings, and several crime items. 9:09 am: Reports on several extreme weather incidents and a weather update; commercial break. 9:13 am: Top stories recapped. 9:14 am: Shopping mall parking? Um, no. A discussion on the Iraq developments with J.D. Hayworth and Bill Pascrell; commercial break. 9:22 am: AP's top 10 stories of the year. 9:23 am: Discussion on Iraq and politics with Fred Barnes (I'm really getting worried about that parking story); commercial break. 9:30 am: Business news update. 9:32 am: Fox News Alert: live report on the Mosul attack from Bret Baier. 9:34 am: Fair and Balanced live report from Rick Leventhal on using school kids for political protests. 9:36 am: Live report from Eric Shawn on Kofi Annan press conference and Oil-for-Food scandal; items on Mideast conflict and the Taj Mahal tilting; commercial break. 9:42 am: Fox News Alert: update on the Mosul attack. 9:43 am: Finally! Insurance study finds least aggressive drivers get the best parking spots (total time: 30 seconds). 9:43 am: Discussion with Bob Lichter and Larry Noble on the "Buy Blue" initiative; commercial break. 9:52 am: Fox News Alert: another live report from Bret Baier on the Mosul attack; commercial break at 9:57. 9:59 am: Fox News Alert: more live reports on the Mosul attack. Does TVN's claim that FNC "ignored" the attack in the 9:00 am hour square with the facts? You decide, but bear in mind that TVN made a similar complaint back in August, and that proved to have been not only inaccurate but also based on an unreliable source. The irrepressible Wonkette also couldn't resist a jab at Fox (but not MSNBC): Rather than go wall-to-wall, as CNN has done, they're delivering the real hard news: "Shopping and politics may have more in common than you think." Which is true, especially if your family's buying you body armor of [sic] Christmas. She then has "Henry the intern" do a rundown of "how Fox reports" in the 10:00 am hour, and the subject matter jumps from Iraq to Rumsfeld to weather to court cases and more, all in the span of about ten minutes. But then it stops. What is left unsaid is that the first block on Fox News Live hits the high points of stories making news; the following two blocks are more in depth, with interviews, analysis, etc. Perhaps this is why Wonkette's Henry stopped where he did, otherwise he would have to mention the four follow-up reports on the Mosul attack in the minutes he didn't cover. TVN asks a legitimate question: Did FNC and MSNBC underreact, or did CNN overreact? But a sentient discussion of the issue cannot be based on incomplete data or misinformation. posted: Tue - December 21, 2004 at 01:14 PM j$p  send Ira Simmons Johnny: Good post. I watched at 10am ET/7 PT and FNC had thorough coverage of the Mosul attacks. At TVN, Brian Stetler often seems to over rely on "e-mailers" and self-proclaimed "insiders" rather than facts. Ira December 21, 2004, 7:39:04 PM EST – Like – Reply Hairy Which is more important? Continuous coverage of breaking news OR running a report on shopping mall parking? I guess Faux ran of folks to get opinions from SO they had to move on. I would bet the expenses of running faux would go up if Ailes actually had to hire reporters to be out in the field rather than bringing in folks that get their thrills out of being on teevee. BUT then again this kind of story doesn't fit in with Faux's "good news all the time" format. BTW Happy Holidays and Season's Greetings. December 21, 2004, 7:54:54 PM EST – Like – Reply johnny dollar The issue isn't what is more important, but rather what better serves the viewer--repeating a story over and over to fill time, or staying on top of it without throwing all the rest of the day's news out the window, and updating viewers when there is something to report. I don't know that any station, including CNN, actually went to continuous coverage (TVNewser didn't get it right about Fox, so I can't be sure he got it right about CNN either), but if you prefer that kind of coverage, then you know where to look. Just don't complain about the next season of hurricanes, or the Bush inauguration. You want continuous? Be careful what you wish for. December 22, 2004, 12:37:02 AM EST – Like – Reply Ira Simmons Hairy: "Faux?" Do you do stand-up comedy? Ha-ha-ha! This is not the newshounds website. Around here we speak and write in English! December 22, 2004, 11:35:09 AM EST – Like – Reply johnny dollar Ira, excellent point. You have inspired me. Come the New Year we're going to have one or two New Rules for postings. Merry Christmas! December 22, 2004, 12:41:37 PM EST – Like – Reply |
Quick Links
About johnnydollar.us
This site includes J$P posts from 2004-2007. For current posts please direct your attention to johnnydollar.us.
Contact Us
j$p categories
Search J$P
Archives
|