Stupidity Comes in ThreesCNN, the AP, the New York Times, Keith Olbermann, and the Mayor of New
Orleans: wait until you see what the Outfoxed gals think of them!
Nothing can twist and distort thinking like good old-fashioned hate.
That's the only explanation we can think of for the bizarre contortions of the
newshounds (another fine product of the Outfoxed cabal). It is amazing to watch
when the need to spew venom overruns any kind of reason. But what happens if
someone actually takes their drivel seriously? We decided we would take hound
logic at face value. When you do that, it's astounding the "facts" that the
newspups bring to light.
CNN, USA Today, and the NY Times Covering for Bush Again! Newspooch Melanie took off after Fox: Fox Claims the Bush Administration "Denounced" Pat Robertson's Assassination Remark Mel's complaint? She questioned if comments by the administration "constitute a Bush administration denunciation of what radical Christian cleric Robertson said". No way! Fox is "stretching it" by using the word "denounced". And the kennel-dwellers rushed to agree:
There's much more, but you get the message. Bad journalism. Spinning for Bush. You'd think by now these gullible schlubs would know better than to believe what the newspooches say. But no. It turns out that once again, they were duped by the hounds. How so? What did CNN report?:
USA Today?
And how about the New York Times?
Clearly, according to the voices from the kennel, the use of "denounced" is just a Fox trick to protect the administration. So what have we learned? That CNN, USA Today, and the New York Times are all part of the conspiracy to cover for Bush! Here endeth the first lesson. The AP and the Washington Post Are Parrots for Bush! What has chrish all up in paws lately? What else? Reporting the news: Mike Emanuel, parroting the administration for Fox, said that military commanders in Iraq expect the activity of the violent extremists to flare up as the election on the constitution, scheduled for October, approaches. OK, on chrish's planet, telling viewers what military commanders are saying makes you a "parrot" for the administration. There must have been an awful lot of parrots during World War II, but then they weren't aware of chrish's New Rule: statements of military commanders are not to be reported, or else you are carrying water for the President. But it seems it's not just Fox who aren't getting their lessons in journalism from chrish. The Washington Post and the Associated Press report:
So what have we learned? The Washington Post and the Associated Press are just propaganda arms for George Bush! Here endeth the second lesson. But don't leave now...the third is really a pip. NBC, Keith Olbermann, the Mayor of New Orleans, and the NY Times: Fear-Mongering Racists! Ellen doesn't think looting is important (unless it is in Baghdad). So she was naturally outraged when Fox dared to report on it: Sean Hannity suddenly fixed on the "big, big problem" of looting in New Orleans.... Nearly everyone in the video was African American.... I have noted racial insensitivity toward African Americans by FOX News. Frankly, I don't understand why that community hasn't come out in force against FNC Hmm. Perhaps ellen is suggesting that news media should institute a quota system for reporting on crime. For every black looter a white looter must be found. Even better, get Ted Turner. His expertise in colorizing old movies can be put to use: every looter can be made a different tint! I have not come across anyone shocked by the looting... In such a dire situation, one might think that looting paled by comparison. But not to Hannity. An even better solution than colorizing the video: spike the news! Don't cover it because Judge Ellen says so. And newsmutt judy seconds the emotion: [John] Gibson replayed the tape of the young black male running away during the interview...noting that some looters are stealing guns. Big deal. Guns are legal in this country. Anybody who wants one can get them. Umm...all right. Just something else the people have no right to know. And by the way, if Orlando Salinas reports on some looting incidents, judy has the answer to that too: Salinas' account is highly dubious. In fact, it is so vague that it sounds made up. Yes, some desperate housewife who watches an hour of tv a day and sits at her computer making up stuff is just the person to declare that looting reports are lies. A bit of projection there? To summarize: looting is an unimportant story, and what's more the reporters are fabricating it, and besides it all stems from racism. So who are these lying racists? The New York Times:
Lisa Daniels on MSNBC devoted an entire program block to this "unimportant" story:
The Washington Post:
Ellen will no doubt tell you that those scoundrels at BlackNews.com are racially "insensitive":
Keith Olbermann must not have gotten ellen's memo, as he too devoted an entire program block to this trivial matter:
And to put the capper on this "unimportant" story:
Nagin's order sounds awfully vague. Judy will tell you that it must have been made up. Or maybe he's just bending to racial prejudice, as per ellen's formulation. So what have we learned? All of these people, from the Times right down to Olbermann and Mayor Nagin, are hyping a story so unimportant it may even be nonexistent. The black community should "come out in force" against them. Because the hounds know better. And here endeth the third, and most preposterous, lesson. posted: Thu - September 1, 2005 at 12:10 AM j$p  send OverHere I can't believe the things they are saying over there, both in the newsmutts articles and in the comments. I shouldn't have expected anything different I suppose. But their hatred is really disgusting. And the way they lie to promote that hatred... well you summed it up here Johnny. September 1, 2005, 10:34:52 AM EDT – Like – Reply Scott Of course the hounds would probably respond with something like "do your own blog on CNN, ours is about FNC" - completely ignoring the fact that it's nonsensical to slam FNC for presenting the exact stories that are being covered in much the same way at every other outlet. Its easy to imagine the kind of glazed, blank-stare response most of the loyalists over there would have when presented with this J$ report. September 1, 2005, 12:05:44 PM EDT – Like – Reply johnny dollar Scott, that's why they don't let me post there! September 1, 2005, 12:13:26 PM EDT – Like – Reply MoonMan Johnny, I wouldn't have such a problem with the Hounds if they were making these claims about the bulk of Mainstream Media, they would still be wrong in most cases, but it wouldn't seem so dishonest like it does when they ignore every other outlets reporting and slam FNC. You are doing a great job and please by all means keep it up. September 1, 2005, 6:35:11 PM EDT – Like – Reply |
Quick Links
About johnnydollar.us
This site includes J$P posts from 2004-2007. For current posts please direct your attention to johnnydollar.us.
Contact Us
j$p categories
Search J$P
Archives
|