Stupid Lie of the Night
You have to hand it to the newshounds (another fine product of the Outfoxed cabal). Their ignorance is flabbergasting, and to cover it up, they are willing to silence the truth, and watch as their minions lie to cover their mutt butts.
This would be just another bit of hound idiocy if it weren't for how clumsily they tried to cover up their cluelessness. Chrish is astonished that Fox is actually running election results during commercials:
To prove their claim that they have the best election coverage, FOX today 5/6/08 carried their bottom-third graphics through commercials on Studio B. Yup, I guess they win in the race for non-stop meaningless coverage.Why is exactly is this such a big deal? CNN and other channels have been doing it for years. But no matter, it was enough to rile up the kennel:
- To advertisers when you do business with Fox you walk out of the room with fleas.
- If I were an advertiser, I'd demand a refund and take my money to a broadcast service that ran commercials in full screen mode.
- Is there a broadcasting rule or something against doing that? I've noticed that legitimate news channels will only interrupt ads like that when there's an extreme weather alert.

Uh oh. The last thing Fox haters will tolerate is someone telling the truth. Our comment was erased within minutes. But even more amazing is what happened in those minutes before it disappeared:
- Of course if Fox defenders say that the other channels are doing it, that, as they say in that great Ed Wood flick, Plan 9 From Outer Space, "proves it."
- I'm on MSNBC now and nada, bupkis, rien, etc. during the commercials.
- MSNBC is not doing it.

tony
I love posting on Newshounds. You have never communicated with a more ignorant hatefilled group of people.
If you feel like having some fun go over there and light some fuses.
May 6, 2008, 7:19:25 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Cecelia
That's an ingenious technique the Hounds have, Johnny.
They erase your post, but respond to it by putting up what they wish others to believe are preemptive responses to "dumb" Fox fan defenses, but which really are comments that are POSTemptive replies to a post they banned.
Could the News Hounds have once worked for Brezhnev? :D
May 6, 2008, 7:22:03 PM EDT – Like – Reply
THE TRUTH!
Don't worry I posted THE TRUTH! I'm waiting to see how long it will take beofre it's deleted. I took a screenshot of the post so they can't can't accuse me of use Vulgar or an other half ass excuse to cover up their lies.
May 6, 2008, 7:29:13 PM EDT – Like – Reply
THE TRUTH!
Don't worry I posted THE TRUTH! I'm waiting to see how long it will take before it's deleted. I've taken a screenshot of the post so they can't accuse me of using Vulgar or any other half ass excuse to cover up their lies.
May 6, 2008, 7:30:56 PM EDT – Like – Reply
johnny dollar
Sorry TRUTH, but your link was quickly erased. I see OlbySucks chimed in with the facts, and HE got erased.
This little exercise proves once and for all that these Fox haters aren't just stupid, or misinformed. They take affirmative steps to censor the truth. That makes them flat-out, 100%, professional liars.
May 6, 2008, 7:40:29 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Dan Tanna
I posted something too....
I love sending libs into a rage.
May 6, 2008, 7:41:17 PM EDT – Like – Reply
THE TRUTH!
Shhhh! No so loud Dan Tanna or Newshounds will delete your post because they don't believe in free speech for people they don't agree or debunk their lies with THE TRUTH!
May 6, 2008, 7:49:12 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Dan Tanna
LOL....
I found out that free specch has its limits....
I wonder what these fools must be like in person.
It is sad that someone could go through life so angry and with a hateful view of the world.
May 6, 2008, 7:52:01 PM EDT – Like – Reply
johnny dollar
Dan Tanna, I loved your work in Vega$.
May 6, 2008, 7:55:10 PM EDT – Like – Reply
steve
ah, good times watching the comments over there, much more entertaining than any of the election coverage
May 6, 2008, 8:13:56 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
They have some far out excuses for deleting posts. Making them up on the fly, no less.
May 6, 2008, 8:30:59 PM EDT – Like – Reply
mickey mac
Wow, THREE visitors online ! What a happenin' blog!
Whatsamatta, did your gang all fall asleep after your circle jerk?
May 6, 2008, 8:57:42 PM EDT – Like – Reply
johnny dollar
Is that on topic? What does it have to do with the lies over at newshounds?
May 6, 2008, 8:59:27 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Fox Fan
Who would you rather be with, three informed, intelligent visitors or 25 willingly brainwashed ones? I'm off to comment there too...
May 6, 2008, 9:19:50 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Grammie
Lets see if my comment stays up. It was on topic, had no vulgar language and was at least minimally cogent.
Oh, Johnny, you are going to be due a big medal if you keep coming up with jewels.
"Mutt Butts"!
Damn, thats good.
May 6, 2008, 9:20:09 PM EDT – Like – Reply
johnny dollar
I went to see what you posted and apparently whatever you wrote was replaced with something about how it was all garbled. But they did invite you to re-post.
Oh wait, now I'm wrong. Your message just reads "troll dropping deleted".
Is it clear to everyone that these liars will do anything to keep from being exposed?
May 6, 2008, 9:24:17 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Fox Fan
I saw Grammie's post, it was very polite and to the point.
I just posted too, I'm sure they're on active deletion mode.
May 6, 2008, 9:25:45 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
3 minutes is all your post made it, grammie.
May 6, 2008, 9:27:07 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
Yours is gone too, ff.
May 6, 2008, 9:27:56 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Grammie
I don't understand how pointing out that both MSNBC and CNN do and have done the same thing b/c that was stated as proof that Fox is doing something at least unsavory in a very early comment that has not been deleted.
"Is there a broadcasting rule or something against doing that? I've noticed that legitimate news channels will only interrupt ads like that when there's an extreme weather alert."
So I understand the rules of the game resonding to a comment that has been accepted can be, or WILL be, declared off topic and deleted?
Just saying/asking.
Thanks,
Grammie | 05.06.08 - 9:21 pm | #
Darn, deleted already for "troll dropping".
BUt OS, this is still up, although I don't know for how long once I point it out here:
"Does anyone know where patsy is? I've been looking for him. What about 'why?' Why is there something instead of nothing? what is the meaningof life? what was I saying?
olbysucks | 05.06.08 - 9:08 pm | # "
OS, you're like a fine wine. You are getting better with age.
I can't stop laughing!
May 6, 2008, 9:30:12 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Fox Fan
I wonder if NHs will mention Brit Hume's minutes of compliments for Obama after his speech.
May 6, 2008, 9:36:50 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Nobody You Know
Hey Grammie,
How's them pom-poms, Baby?
You must understand that at NH they are very, very sensitive. They are easily offended. All I have to do is show up and say "Boo!" and they are in a tizzy again. Whenever I start responding to what they are talking about, all I hear is "Get outta here, Troll!"
May 6, 2008, 9:45:24 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
Grammie, what's even funnier is the moderator of that fine site, newsmutts, took it upon themselves to add this part:
"Why is there something instead of nothing? what is the meaningof life? what was I saying?"
For obvious reasons....lack of honesty.
May 6, 2008, 9:49:40 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Grammie
Spectacular as ever, if I do say so myself.
Those folks are beyond sensitive. In effect they are saying anyone who does not agree exactly with them are trolls. What do they do when they have minor disagreements with each other? Nothing as bloody as an in family fight.
OS, that is doubly priceless. Damn, now I'm laughing again.
Nobody, have you seen OS's comment about Patsy? Priceless!
May 6, 2008, 9:58:04 PM EDT – Like – Reply
johnny dollar
If you disagree with them you just might be a troll and deleted. If you question whether they got something right, or expose where they lied about something, you are an INSTANT troll and will be nuked on sight.
There are literally, Literally, hundreds of examples I have documented where they have fudged, smeared, and outright lied to smear Fox. Proven. If there is a more craven pack of liars on the internet I have not found them.
May 6, 2008, 10:04:43 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Nobody You Know
Grammie,
Yup, for a while. But some comments on NH have a short lifespan.
May 6, 2008, 10:05:15 PM EDT – Like – Reply
johnny dollar
OK here is a classic. Some guy named G-Man posted links to shots from MSNBC and CNN showing the election results under commercials. (Not my grabs either.) The response:
those look like photoshop to me.
Hahahahaaaaaaaahaaaahahahahaaaa! What tools!
Of course the hounds deleted his links to the screengrabs. What sleazy propagandists they are.
May 6, 2008, 10:08:46 PM EDT – Like – Reply
G-Man
I posted links to caps I took of CNN and MSNBC doing the same lower-third deed. The post was deleted after just a few minutes. So I reposted. Deleted again. Then I re-reposted, adding a tagline asking why it keeps getting deleted. This one is still up after almost a half an hour. Someone accused them of being Photoshopped. Go figure.
May 6, 2008, 10:55:11 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Fox Fan
Good job, G-Man. My posts there didn't last quite so long. It's a fascinating environment.
May 6, 2008, 11:01:56 PM EDT – Like – Reply
G-Man
Fascinating, but kinda creepy. Kinda like an alternate reality where the Communists won the Cold War.
May 6, 2008, 11:05:03 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Grammie
G-Man, I wonder if they have an altar with an eternal flame in honor of Josef Stalin?
May 6, 2008, 11:09:09 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Fox Fan
Even scarier, B-Man, it's a real-life situation where thought police have willing subjects who pursue self-brainwashing for the sake of a political ideology.
May 6, 2008, 11:20:35 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Fox Fan
Sorry, meant G-Man, G-Man... :/
May 6, 2008, 11:21:29 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Nobody You Know
NH and their post deleting reminds one of the Third Reich and their book burning. Kinda creepy...........
May 6, 2008, 11:44:49 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
Suzy, Johnny Dollars Place and olbermann watch are great places to hang out. They allow dissenting opinion.
olbysucks | Homepage | 05.07.08 - 5:38 pm | #
In truthful terms
They encourage lying , GOP backing douchebags like the imbecile above........
MCMetal | 05.07.08 - 5:40 pm | #
I get the feeling mcmetal doesn't like conservatives........
May 7, 2008, 5:38:06 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
They allow dissenting opinion.
olbysucks | Homepage | 05.07.08 - 5:38 pm | #
Actually, they don't. But go check it out anyway, Suzy.
Visitor55 | 05.07.08 - 5:41 pm | #
May 7, 2008, 5:39:44 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
Please don't respond to Olbysucks.
He is deleted on site.
If you quote him, I'll delete your posts too.
Thanks
MoD | 05.07.08 - 5:45 pm | #
May 7, 2008, 5:42:05 PM EDT – Like – Reply
johnny dollar
Don't you love how they allow dissenting opinions over there? LOL!
May 7, 2008, 5:45:00 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
I never once sweared or called anyone a single name. I linked my name to OW and it went down hill from there. I posted a link to here in regards to the lie about Fox News being the only one using campaign tickers during commercials and it was up for quite a while, actually. Shocker! Really.
May 7, 2008, 5:51:16 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
I have deleted Olbysucks' posts and some of the replies. Please do not engage him. He is a delete-on-sight troll.
GMod | 05.07.08 - 5:56 pm | #
Now I know what patsy felt like......
May 7, 2008, 6:30:53 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
You all need to look over olbysucks. He's one of the 4 regulars on Dollar's site and there's nobody over there to talk too.
john t | Homepage | 05.07.08 - 7:14 pm | #
he's also the dumbest of the 4. by far. which is really saying something.
johnnie-jeff | 05.07.08 - 7:19 pm | #
Look what the cat drug out, philby in the flesh on newshounds!
May 7, 2008, 7:18:02 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
Maybe they figured, "Ah... with all these fake democrats (Colmes, Powers) and obvious Republican shills (Rove, Hannity, etc.), we should tone it down and not bring an O'Reilly into the mix. Even to our dumbest, most misinformed trogladytes in the audience, we gotta appear 'fair and balanced.'"
crallspace | Homepage | 05.07.08 - 7:44 pm | #
May 7, 2008, 7:43:18 PM EDT – Like – Reply
john t
olbysucks | Homepage | 05.07.08 - 7:23 pm
--------------
Hey Dollar, the next time you send over one of your flock to troll the News Hounds, could you pick one with a higher IQ than 20.
If you can find one.
May 7, 2008, 8:14:33 PM EDT – Like – Reply
johnny dollar
I didn't have to "send" anyone over there, though I saw you spreading that lie repeatedly. Since you post at newshounds, you picked a place where lies are comfortable and welcomed.
Thank you for your comment.
May 7, 2008, 8:22:56 PM EDT – Like – Reply
john t
you picked a place where lies are comfortable and welcomed.
Thank you for your comment.
johnny dollar | Homepage | 05.07.08 - 8:27 pm
----------------
No, I never said I was going to keep posting over here.
May 7, 2008, 8:34:54 PM EDT – Like – Reply
johnny dollar
Of course not. Fox haters don't welcome people who challenge their falsehoods, so if you feel more at home at a site that deletes truth telling it is natural you would stay in the kennel with the hounds. Enjoy the echo chamber.
May 7, 2008, 9:10:50 PM EDT – Like – Reply
Fox Fan
john t. would never post here regularly. He doesn't have moderators who delete the comments that prove him wrong at every turn here. Just fair and balanced conversation, as long as it's civil.
May 7, 2008, 10:25:12 PM EDT – Like – Reply
olbysucks
Rudy Ramirez is back on newsmutts! Under a different name, of course.
>
We need to be fair. Lots a people think Rush was a draft dodger and didn't go into the army because he had hemmaroids. Wrong. He has a pilonidal cyst which hurt and could a hurt soldiers around him when the pain was too much. Im sure he would have gone if it had just been hemmaroids.
Royal King | 05.08.08 - 3:06 pm | #
May 8, 2008, 3:07:59 PM EDT – Like – Reply