1/19/10 11:18 AM

Tuesday Links and Open Thread

Latest cable news links [updated through the day]:

Monday's numbers: another FNC sweep! Weekly ranker. CNN's slide.

Keith dodges disagreement?

Wednesday: Hannity vs Donahue!

Shuster taunts Rove.

Q&A: Glenn Beck, Courtney Friel, Kiran & John.

Profile: Beck. Is FNC crazy?

Hotline after dark.

Video: Maddow w/Letterman.

Live Desk editing gaffe apology @1:10pm:


Use our valuable bandwidth to post your cable news comments in today's open thread. Standard rules apply.




Cecelia
I can see that Courtney Friel is certainly lovely, but does she know the entire alphabet?
March 17, 2009, 10:47:36 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Grammie
I just realized what today is, BOR's appearance for the IHTAF is today.
 
The petition to keep BOR from speaking has died with barely a whimper having collected a measley 922 signatures.
 
Poor Alpha Mutt, Pegleg. This must be a sad day for her. She had such high hopes that "We're gonna git this suckah! ".  
 
As hard as this is for Pegleg the real good guys in this, the foundation and those they help, ultimately prevailed. True poetic justice would be if the foundation collected more than they would have b/c of the donations from those who were appallled by the attacks on IHTAF just to embarass BOR.
March 17, 2009, 11:06:42 AM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Wow, so the petition actually achieved 9% of its goal of 10,000 signatures? Oh wait, no, somehow that goal got changed so it now reads 2,000 signatures. ROFL! Even after doctoring the numbers they didn't even get halfway there.
March 17, 2009, 11:10:17 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Cecelia
True poetic justice would be if the foundation collected more than they would have b/c of the donations from those who were appallled by the attacks on IHTAF just to embarass BOR.
Grammie | 03.17.09 - 11:11 am | #  
 
Finally, some "unintended consequences" foisted upon us by zealots that could turn out to be actually helpful to someone!
March 17, 2009, 11:30:33 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Blackflon
johnny dollar | Homepage | 03.17.09 - 11:15 am | #  
 
It will be interesting how the Mutts and the Muttettes handle this news. They will probably blame the victim of their smears and attacks. Oh, the irony!!!!!
March 17, 2009, 11:31:55 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
Are the Friends guilty of not giving the whole Senator Grassley quote? Is this day 2 of the FNC editing outrages.
From what I saw on F&F this morning...The Grassly quote ended after he said "resign or go commit suicide." But thanks to CNBC I now know he went onto to say "And in the case of the Japanese, they usually commit suicide before they make any apology." Why was this part missing from the F&F coverage?
 
I also noticed when Americas news room were talking about Gary Skoien being attacked by his wife after she found him with 2 prostitutes. Why was there absolutely no mention of Mr. Skoien being the former GOP Chairman in Illinois...I wonder why that was? I suspect if this had been a Democrat that info would've been made crystal clear from the outset.
March 17, 2009, 12:00:19 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
Cecelia | 03.17.09 - 10:52 am  
 
I have it on unimpeachable authority that, not only does Ms. Friel know the entire English alphabet, she also knows the entire alphabets of several other languages.
March 17, 2009, 12:31:15 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
Moddow on Letterman:
 
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_M9vslhokstU/SK1q9V2MJ_I/AAAAAAAAB1Y/1lLyl0a1UKY/s400/buddy+holly.jpg
 
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/Leno_Maddow.flv.jpg
March 17, 2009, 12:38:56 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
Haggis,
 
Megyn Kelly mentioned Mr. Skoien was once some sort of local Republican big wig during Kelly's Court. (Skoien, the former Cook County GOP chairman, not "the former GOP Chairman in Illinois )
 
Are you no longer interested in "Why did FNC edit...today...what Joe Biden said during the campaign....?"
March 17, 2009, 12:51:47 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Grammie
Correction re IHTAF.
 
Mike just informed me on OW that the IHTAF lunch is on Thursday, March 19.
 
I'm sorry for the mistake.
 
The petition has been shut down with 922 signatures so I guess their is no point to continueing it on life support.
March 17, 2009, 12:55:44 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
What you mean the claim that there was "absolutely no mention" turns out to be less than accurate? Shocker!
March 17, 2009, 12:55:55 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Thanks for the update, Grammie. I guess they'll have to redirect their efforts now to the We Demand FNC Fire Beck, Hannity, and O'Reilly! petition.
March 17, 2009, 12:57:23 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
vstol | 03.17.09 - 12:56 pm |
 
Kelly did say something about a republican in passing...but this was said near the end of the segment...If it had been a democrat....You would have been told this at the beginning and also on screen and you know it.
 
Yes I'm interested..."Why did FNC edit...today...what Joe Biden said during the campaign....?"
March 17, 2009, 1:02:06 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Grammie
Just for you, Haggy, since you seem to have such a strong interest in miscreant's political party not being named, much less highlighted:
 
http://newsbusters.org/search/google?cx=000670030471699741183%3Aydh8bjxaqui&cof=FORID%3A11&query=Name+that+Party&op=G
 
There are well over a thousand links to threads documenting the flaw that you are so concerned about from their archives.
 
I think it would be very nice if you came back after educating yourself on it and share with the rest of us what you found.
March 17, 2009, 1:08:39 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
At least FNC have now apologised for their outrageous editing error....2 mins late but I'll forgive them for that  I do wish they had elaborated a bit and told use how this error could have happened in the 1st place....Thankfully TP were on the ball.
March 17, 2009, 1:16:02 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
From Monday's thread:
 
It's a funny thing here....When FNC are in the wrong....Everyone will talk about anything else but the topic at hand.
Haggis | 03.16.09 - 6:36 pm | #  
=-=-=-=-=
Haggis | 03.16.09 - 6:36 pm | #  
 
FNC was wrong. It's my guess that they will admit it, offer an apology to VP Biden and their viewers without having to be asked and move on. Sort of like the vast majority of commenters here, with a few exceptions.vstol | 03.16.09 - 7:06 pm |
=-=-=-=
 
Just now on Live Desk:
 
We screwed up. The clip wasn't what we said it was, it was something else, sorry. When we scre up, we correct it.-MM
March 17, 2009, 1:20:57 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
vstol | 03.17.09 - 12:43 pm |
 
What exactly is the point of your 12:43pm post? It looks as if your simply trying to mock Rachel's choice of specks...Are you taking a leaf out of Ingraham's play book?
March 17, 2009, 1:23:35 PM EDT – Like – Reply


cee
FNC made a mistake, they admitted it, they apologized....good professional behavior.
 
Unlike the left's man, Keith Olbermann, who misquoted Bill O'Reilly recently and did not take personal responsibility for the mistake, nor did he apologize.
 
See the difference between NBC NEWS and FNC?.....Like night and day.
 
"RESIGN!"
March 17, 2009, 1:34:25 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Olby Sucks
"From what I saw"
 
There's that little wiggle room haggy desperately needs......
March 17, 2009, 1:36:31 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
Grammie | 03.17.09 - 1:13 pm |
 
The only reason I brought up the lack party recognition...was simply because the Friends always make great play of this when a [D] is not named as such on another channel....Lets hope they show the same outrage over this little matter.
 
Olby Sucks | Homepage | 03.17.09 - 1:41 pm  
 
As usual OS is wrong....I said "From what I saw" for one simple reason....I didn't see the whole show...Since your clocks changed I miss more of it as I'm still at work...So I was just being honest when I said that.  
Where are you going undercover today?...I wonder if there will be another outing today.
March 17, 2009, 1:50:35 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Grammie
So, I guess that means you didn't take advantage of my link.
 
How conveeeeeeeeent!
March 17, 2009, 1:55:02 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
Haggis,
 
Were you correct when you said " Mr. Skoien being the former GOP Chairman in Illinois?"
 
Did you get that information from any particular source? Did you check it out before passing it on? When you screw up, do you admit it, correct the mistake or offer any apology?
March 17, 2009, 1:59:39 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Blackflon
cee | 03.17.09 - 1:39 pm |  
 
Olbermann apologize?? Surely you jest.
 
Now I wonder if the News Mutts will apologize for their own smear job. Don't count on it. Their too busy watching the johnt and Michael Weston show. If you know what I mean.
March 17, 2009, 2:38:23 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
Why was there absolutely no mention of Mr. Skoien being the former GOP Chairman in Illinois...I wonder why that was?  
Haggis | 03.17.09 - 12:05 pm | #  
 
Translation:
 
Haggis is angry that the hosts on Fox did not lie.
March 17, 2009, 2:40:45 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
vstol | 03.17.09 - 2:04 pm |
 
What I said wasn't wrong....He was a GOP chairman IN Illinois....I said "in" and not "of"....Cook County is IN Illinois after all...So technically I was correct...I wrote the post from memory.  
 
Grammie | 03.17.09 - 2:00 pm |
 
I was simply using Ashley's logic....My PC might get infected if I go there.
 
I know this sort of thing happens...But the Friends always bash channels that have done this....I simply found it hypocritical that FNC do the same....Will the Friends now bash Americas news room for doing this?...After all it would be the "fair & balanced" thing to do.
March 17, 2009, 2:41:33 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
> What I said wasn't wrong....He was a GOP chairman IN Illinois....I said "in" and not "of"
 
You also said he was THE Chairman in IL. THE Chairman in IL is the chairman of the state. A GOP chairman is one of many locals. THE Chairman means he's one of one, not one of many. So technically, you're still wrong.
 
But you accomplished your goal, which is to drive the discussion to your talking points. Which is to say, the Fox-hater blue blog talking points. So with your latest disingenuous substitution of "a" for "the", let's move on to something else.
March 17, 2009, 2:48:34 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
I simply found it hypocritical that FNC do the same....Haggis | 03.17.09 - 2:46 pm | #  
 
Hmmmm - you bash FNC when they do it, but you don't bash anyone else when they do it.
 
Now, what do they call that again???
March 17, 2009, 2:54:40 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
J$,
 
Please indulge me a follow up.
 
Haggis,
 
I asked,"Did you get that information from any particular source? Did you check it out before passing it on? When you screw up, do you admit it, correct the mistake or offer any apology?
 
Your response,"...I wrote the post from memory. "
 
From memory? Damn Sam! I thought you conjured it up!
 
Memory of what? From where? By whom? When? Childhood memory?
 
Èirinn gu bràth
March 17, 2009, 2:58:00 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
johnny dollar | Homepage | 03.17.09 - 2:53 pm |  
 
Well spotted Johnny...I thought that little change might wiggle through....In my defence...I had a full English on the go while typing that post....But I apologies for the error....The main point of the post still stands.
 
Haggis is angry that the hosts on Fox did not lie.
Ashley | 03.17.09 - 2:45 pm |
 
What's that all about....Ashley....Were you on the sherry last night or something? or have you got those republican specks on again?
March 17, 2009, 3:09:46 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
Ashley | 03.17.09 - 2:59 pm |
 
Ashley...I'm at a distinct disadvantage over here in the UK....I only get FNC....So I can't comment on channels I don't see(Like CNN(America) MSNBC) and you wouldn't expect me too.
 
vstol | 03.17.09 - 3:03 pm |
 
To be honest I can't remember where I read it yesterday....I was only reminded of it after watching the segment on ANR.
March 17, 2009, 3:18:53 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Grammie
Wow, Johnny, this was a very close call. If ufoshadow hadn't jumped in and squashed the leak your mild mannered blogger cover would have been blown to hell and away.
 
Claudo got too close with this:
---------------------------------------------
"This just in - Johnny Dollar is Up Fox News' Ass
Question is - Does he get paid to do it?
 
From TV Newser:
 
"FNC To Address Using Misleading Biden Clip
This afternoon on The Live Desk at 1pmET, FNC will address using a misleading clip of Vice President Joe Biden on the program yesterday, reports Johnny Dollar..."
 
So how the [juvenile vulgarity deleted] does this loser know what Fox will be broadcasting. Methinks he just outed himself.
 
So
 
Posted by: claudo on Tue 3.17 1:25pm "
---------------------------------------------
 
I think the joint venture with Fox, Darth Cheney and Michelle Malkin has really paid off. By yourself you never could have nailed talent such as ufoshadow .
 
---------------------------------------------
"Posted by: claudo on Tue 3.17 1:25pm
 
Claudo,
Politico has had a blurb about it up for most of the morning. Seems FNC got a ton of flack. Anyway, here is the link to the Politico article
 
http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0309/Fox_to_address_Biden_edit_mistake.html#comments
 
I also posted it on the mains thread about the clip.
_________________
"I'm not responsible for half the things I've said." Yogi Berra
 
Posted by: ufoshadow on Tue 3.17 2:01pm "

Edited By Siteowner
March 17, 2009, 3:20:14 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Whew! That was a close one. So my double-secret off-the-record payments sent by anonymous Courier to a numbered Swiss vault whose code is hermetically sealed in a jar on Funk and Wagnalls porch will continue for a while. But that claudo, he's so bright and knowledgeable and super-intellectual I'm afraid my secret identity just won't stand up to his brilliant investigative work for much longer!
March 17, 2009, 3:25:32 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
Grammie | 03.17.09 - 3:25 pm |
 
Not so fast Grammie....The link below is a cache of that politico page....No mention of the apology coming at 1:10pm like johnny stated...This then appears after the apology was given... "UPDATE 2: Fox, right around 1:10, apologized for using the Biden clip"
The question still stands...Who told Johnny the apology would come at 1:10pm?
 
http://74.125.47.132/search?sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fblogs%2Fmichaelcalderone%2F0309%2FFox_to_address_Biden_edit_mistake.html%23comments
March 17, 2009, 3:34:26 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
What's that all about....Ashley....Were you on the sherry last night or something? or have you got those republican specks on again?
Haggis | 03.17.09 - 3:14 pm | #  
 
Umm, Haggis, you wanted them to identify the guy as "Mr. Skoien being the former GOP Chairman in Illinois".
 
That would be a lie.
 
Ashley...I'm at a distinct disadvantage over here in the UK....I only get FNC....So I can't comment on channels I don't see(Like CNN(America) MSNBC) and you wouldn't expect me too.
 
A couple of things. The first being you have repeatedly commented on things you've seen watching MSNBC online, in fact, you criticised FNC for not having the same type of online broadcast as MSNBC. Second, you frequently demand we comment on things we haven't seen, now here you are repeatedly refusing to comment on things you haven't seen.
March 17, 2009, 3:36:33 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
J$, does the cable network even have an ass? I'm pretty sure he was let go years ago and now tries to compete against BOR on another network.
March 17, 2009, 3:37:59 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
For a minute there I thought you were going say it was David Shuster, but he's not on at 8:00 pm.
March 17, 2009, 3:39:06 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
Umm, Haggis, you wanted them to identify the guy as "Mr. Skoien being the former GOP Chairman in Illinois".
That would be a lie.
Ashley | 03.17.09 - 3:41 pm |
 
Ashley....You're all wrong....I simply wanted them to show he was a [R] nothing more nothing less.
 
If I've seen something....then I can comment on it...It doesn't really matter if I saw it online or TV.....I just don't have MSNBC streaming full time....Where as I can have FNC on as background noise on the TV.
March 17, 2009, 3:47:25 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Grammie
Not so fast Grammie....
 
'"ve now heard that Fox will address this at 1:10 p.m. during "Live Desk." Will update later.
 
UPDATE: According to a Fox spokesperson, here's part of the response: "We inadvertently used a piece of video of Vice President Biden saying the 'fundamentals of the economy are strong.' This video was from the campaign trail, when the Vice President was a candidate, and was actually quoting Senator John McCain."
 
You were saying?
March 17, 2009, 3:53:11 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
Haggis | 03.17.09 - 3:52 pm | #  
 
Haggis - VSTOL said Megyn Kelly did mention he was a republican.
 
"Where as I can have FNC on as background noise on the TV."
 
Har! You are glued to every word and you know it!
March 17, 2009, 3:58:10 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
Where as I can have FNC on as background noise on the TV.
Haggis | 03.17.09 - 3:52 pm | #  
 
Oh, and may I add that you are not only glued to every word, you also clearly hear when the don't say something as in:
 
" Why was there absolutely no mention of Mr. Skoien being the former GOP Chairman in Illinois..."
March 17, 2009, 4:01:09 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
"I've now heard that Fox will address this at 1:10 p.m. during "Live Desk." Will update later."
Grammie | 03.17.09 - 3:58 pm |
 
You are correct there...I admit I just looked at the updates,,,,But the question still stands...Where did Michael Calderone get info about the apology being at 1:10pm....He doesn't say the info came directly from FNC....So I'm suggesting he got the info from Johnny....If that's correct....Then where did Johnny get the info?
March 17, 2009, 4:11:19 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
What came first, the chicken or the egg?
 
How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
 
Is there such a thing as a square circle?
 
How many different aliases has Haggis used?
 
More questions for our time!
March 17, 2009, 4:17:14 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
Haggis,
 
I get banned from the unmoderated NH O/T forum by Ellen because, as she said, I "have proved that (I am) not here in good faith," even though I was making truthful and relevent statements, providing accurate and sourced quotes, sometimes of Ellen herself, correcting distortions and outright falsehoods by NH writers and commenters and for having the unmitigated gall of expressing my sense of humor along with my opinion, yet you, Sir, are tolerated here despite your numerous lies, many aliases, frequent misrepresentations, perpetual deflections and symtomatic Avoidant Personality Disorder.
 
On top of that, you are totally unrepentant.
 
What say you?

Edited By Siteowner
March 17, 2009, 4:31:39 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Grammie
"....So I'm suggesting he got the info from Johnny....If that's correct....Then where did Johnny get the info?
Haggis | 03.17.09 - 4:16 pm | # "
 
"I've now heard that Fox will address this at 1:10 p.m. during "Live Desk." Will update later.
 
"UPDATE: According to a Fox spokesperson, here's part of the response: "We inadvertently used a piece of video of Vice President Biden saying the 'fundamentals of the economy are strong.' This video was from the campaign trail, when the Vice President was a candidate, and was actually quoting Senator John McCain."
 
You were saying.........?
 
I would think you would do your homework at least sometimes. All the bombs you toss out fizzle and fade away as the duds they are yet you continue to go off half cocked.
 
From now on I think I will simply ignore what you say as most likely not being worth the powder to blow it to hell.
March 17, 2009, 4:38:59 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
johnny dollar | Homepage | 03.17.09 - 4:22 pm |
 
Since you want to steer the conversation away from all things 1:10pm related...I'll have a crack at the chicken and egg question.
 
Some people say a God created all things...I personally don't subscribe to this theory....But for this question I'll go along with it. If I've got this right....God created a fully functioning Adam & Eve straight off the bat...So as he needed no birthing procedures to create them...I suggest he simply made a couple of chickens the same way...Then after that God created an egg...The 2 chickens got frisky....and the rest is history.
March 17, 2009, 4:45:35 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
We have learned that reliable sources say someone in the know believes insiders have indicated an anonymous leak unequivocally suggests there is every reason to believe that at 4:51 pm on 03.16.09 at the location of the Place of J$, Haggis will step in it again.


Edited By Siteowner
March 17, 2009, 4:47:23 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Olby Sucks
"Where as I can have FNC on as background noise on the TV."
 
Har! You are glued to every word and you know it!
Ashley | 03.17.09 - 4:03 pm | #  
 
Of course, he is! He probably has a bat phone on his desk ready at all times, too. Logged on to TP, newshounds, media matters, foxnews.com, has countdown streaming all simultaneously! Right next to the bat phone in his trusty tin. :lol:
March 17, 2009, 4:49:51 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
What say you?
vstol | 03.17.09 - 4:36 pm |  
 
Firstly I thought the rules stated no personal attacks..."Slut" seems to fit that definition....Strange thing to call a man.
 
I can only suggest you contact NH and ask them why you got banned...I personally have no power there to help you out.
 
As for Johnny letting me post here....I can't answer that either...Another e-mail maybe.  
 
Grammie | 03.17.09 - 4:43 pm |
 
I was simply concocting a small conspiracy theory...No harm intended.
March 17, 2009, 5:00:33 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
Is Shuster taunting Rove or is he teasing his 1600 viewers?
March 17, 2009, 5:11:24 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Cecelia
I have it on unimpeachable authority that, not only does Ms. Friel know the entire English alphabet, she also knows the entire alphabets of several other languages.
vstol | 03.17.09 - 12:36 pm | #  
 
Well, is pig latin one of the languages?   
 
(I'm being awful, I know...)
March 17, 2009, 5:19:21 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Haggis, you're correct about that 'slut' reference. Sorry I missed it.
March 17, 2009, 5:21:47 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
johnny dollar | Homepage | 03.17.09 - 5:26 pm |
 
Cheers Johnny...But don't worry about it....I've been called worse...But admittedly never that
March 17, 2009, 5:27:07 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
I don't think it was ever intended to be an insult, just a play on the old routine by Dan Ackroyd on the original SNL - NBC's Saturday Night, the newscasts with Jane Curtin.
March 17, 2009, 5:31:41 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Cecelia
.Then after that God created an egg...The 2 chickens got frisky....and the rest is history.
Haggis | 03.17.09 - 4:50 pm | # 
 
No, chickens (and birds in general) evolved from dinosaurs, Haggis (with Eggs Benedict being their highest evolutionary calling).
March 17, 2009, 5:32:46 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Cecelia
Cheers Johnny...But don't worry about it....I've been called worse...But admittedly never that
Haggis | 03.17.09 - 5:32 pm | # 
 
I had gone my entire life without being called that too, until I got a computer and started arguing with 'enlightened' liberal men on the internet...
March 17, 2009, 5:41:18 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Grammie
Johnny, that didn't raise the alarm with me b/c I thought it was a play on Jane Curtin and who? as the newscasters.
March 17, 2009, 5:49:14 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Blackflon
vstol | 03.17.09 - 4:36 pm |
 
You were banned from the Mutt House?
 
No surprise there. They hate almost any idea or opinion that is contrary to theirs. And they are quick to stray from the subject matter in order to make fools of themselves because they know they have been smacked down so they have this need to retaliate.
March 17, 2009, 5:49:59 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
You may be right, but the original quote was 'you ignorant slut', so it didn't ring that bell with me until someone pointed it out. Oh, the life-and-death decisions a thread moderator makes every day!
March 17, 2009, 5:50:30 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Cecelia
Johnny, you can always sit back and leave the driving to Grammie and me.
 
We promise not to delete Haggis or to make his posts say even more ridiculous things... much... 
March 17, 2009, 5:55:46 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
LOL....I see Beck is worried about the power companies just turning down the power so your air conditioning wont run so high. I don't know what voltage the US runs on...but over here we run on 240v....So according to Becks the power companies are simply going to give me 200v....The only problem with that is,,,,Nothing will work.
 
Anyone have a link to the article he talked about in the segment, thanks....I'm sorry I simply don't trust the small quote he read out.
March 17, 2009, 5:59:16 PM EDT – Like – Reply


2008
Wow, so the petition actually achieved 9% of its goal of 10,000 signatures? Oh wait, no, somehow that goal got changed so it now reads 2,000 signatures. ROFL! Even after doctoring the numbers they didn't even get halfway there.
johnny dollar | Homepage | 03.17.09 - 11:15 am | # 
----------------------------
 
As usual yet another failed initiative from the proven liars at News Mutts
 
Poor Ellen and Priscilla ( claudo in drag ) seem to be all that is left on that pitiable site......and still they peddle the non-stop lies to their obedient subjects who accept without question.
 
How Sad....
March 17, 2009, 6:06:35 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
Cecelia | 03.17.09 - 5:46 pm | # 
 
Don't panic...I may disagree with you....but I'll never call you that. 
 
Of course those upstanding gentlemen of the Right wouldn't dream of calling a woman that.(sarcasm off)
March 17, 2009, 6:10:51 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
Ashley is correct re: the old SNL newscast routine. My intention was the same as Ackroyds's, to be humorously insulting, not to make a personal attack. My apologies to the ladies, J$ and anyone who was offended. 
 
To Haggis, I apologize for breaking the rules. BTW, if I had wanted to attack, I probably would've used the original modifier, "Lying," as opposed to my misspelled, kinder and gentler "disingenuous."
 
I don't need to contact NH as to why I was banned. I explained the reason in my post. I didn't mention it to complain, but to make a comparrison, one so obvious that even you couldn't miss, between the the boss at NH and the boss at J$P and a less obvious comparrison between your comments and truthful, relevant, credible comments made in good faith. I used good faith at the top so I could tie it to you being unrepentant at the bottom.
 
I don't need to ask Johnny why he allow you to post here. It's obvious for anyone who has eyes to see. Again, I was making a comparrison.
=-=-=
 
Cecelia,
 
You're right. The entire Pig Latin alphabet is one of the several I was refering to that are in Ms. Friel repertoire. Don't scoff, it's not as easy as you think, O-ay a-kay iss-May X-Ray Uv-ay Un-say Ine-shay?
March 17, 2009, 6:20:34 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
Hey, just a word to fans of Patrick Heckman (aka TheDreadedPatrick, aka Michael Weston, aka Michael Todd, aka Fixed News, aka Bababooey, aka yada yada yada...). He's got his own blog now. Stop by and leave a few encouraging comments on one of his posts!
 
http://open.salon.com/blog/the_dreaded_patrick
March 17, 2009, 6:22:02 PM EDT – Like – Reply


2008
(aka TheDreadedPatrick, aka Michael Weston, aka Michael Todd, aka Fixed News, aka Bababooey, aka yada yada yada...).
 
LOL!!
 
Another proven sock puppet News Mutt liar exposed
 
Thanks for the heads up Johnny....I'll have to stop by and say "hello" to him
March 17, 2009, 6:33:51 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Haggis
"Lying," as opposed to my misspelled, kinder and gentler "disingenuous."
vstol | 03.17.09 - 6:25 pm |
 
Don't worry about using that term...Ashley regularly starts calling me that when he's on the loosing end of an argument.
March 17, 2009, 6:36:58 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
Two things I wouldn't do.
 
1) Regularly call you, or anyone equally deserving, a liar.
 
2) Be on the loosing end of an argument, especially with you.
March 17, 2009, 6:59:00 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Nibbles
Haggis, I'd just like to thank you for taking all the attacks over here and fighting through them to try and deliver the truth to these folk about Fox.
 
Lets hope the real facts behind the editing scandal come out soon. I can't wait to hear how this mishap occurred.
Maybe this is how it happened. Junior intern accidentally finds Biden campaign tape in his hands. Junior intern then accidentally edits Biden tape to only show "the fundamentals of the economy are sound" part. Junior intern then accidentally edits this part into a tape of stuff that was said on the previous Sunday. Junior intern then accidentally passes it on for airing. Quality control then completely miss the error and air it. Admit it folks, that just didn't happen. I'd say some editor looked at the tape they had and thought no one really knows these folk, so lets spice it up with someone they do know, Biden. This has probably been done before and no one notice. But thankfully now there are many sharp eyes.
March 17, 2009, 7:15:47 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Puck30
Special report w/Bret Baier – 2,151,000 viewers (557,000) (977,000)
Situation Room—566,000 viewers (125,000) (249,000)
1600 Pennsylvania Ave —348,000 viewers (73,000) (184,000)
 
Johnny, I think it's gona take more than 'Bumper Stickers'.
March 17, 2009, 7:19:55 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Cecelia
http://open.salon.com/blog/ the_d...dreaded_patrick
johnny dollar | Homepage | 03.17.09 - 6:27 pm | # 
 
Do you think we should?
 
He does probably need a word of encouragement. That's obvious by all the attempts he's made to be here.
 
He needs a father figure and the strong male types here are a draw for him.
 
We did enjoy his company as Bababooey. Of course we all thought he was a woman, which upset the heck out of him, but otherwise, I think he had a good time.
 
It's clear the poor kid has gender identity issues and needs all support he can get.
 
It's not a bad idea to go give him a shout-out. Let him know we care and that we're here if he wants to talk.
March 17, 2009, 7:30:09 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
"Haggis, I'd just like to thank you for taking all the attacks over here..."- Nibbles | 03.17.09 - 7:20 pm | # 
 
Just how many, aproximately, is the total of all those attacks Haggis has been taking?
 
I figure out yesterday how the Biden clip screw up happened.
March 17, 2009, 9:11:53 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Cecelia
I haven't watched Glenn Beck, but if the David Frum piece is anywhere near true, Beck has gone around the bend, and (like Huck Finn) lit out for the territories...
March 17, 2009, 11:20:42 PM EDT – Like – Reply


johnny dollar
I haven't made up my mind about Beck. But check tomorrow's post. I'm going to embed a video from Beck's latest show. I'd like to get your reaction to it...in tomorrow's thread of course.
March 17, 2009, 11:30:45 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Damail
Olbermann won't have a dissenting voice on next to him when he appears on "Real Time"? Say it ain't so.
 
I am shocked, SHOCKED, I tell you!
March 18, 2009, 12:24:11 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
"Haggis, I'd just like to thank you for taking all the attacks over here and fighting through them to try and deliver the truth to these folk about Fox."
 
Like that time that Gretchen said "Holiday Party" and "Stan" was there to back Haggis up.
 
Like the time that BOR called Obama a pinhead.
 
Like that time John Gibson inferred that our Attorney General was a monkey.
 
Like that time earlier today when Fox did not identify the guy as being a former republican official.
 
Yeah, Haggis is delivering "truth" about Fox. 
 
I wonder if "nibbles" knows "stan"?
March 18, 2009, 12:26:55 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
vstol | 03.17.09 - 7:04 pm | #
 
While you stand on your high and mighty pedestal, I would like to point out that you called me a liar, but you neglected to give any details about that.
March 18, 2009, 12:34:39 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
Olbermann won't have a dissenting voice on next to him when he appears on "Real Time"? Say it ain't so.
 
I am shocked, SHOCKED, I tell you!
Damail | 03.18.09 - 12:29 am | # 
 
Three things KO cannot do:
 
1) debate
 
2) drive a car
 
3) do an actual news analysis show and stop talking about Fox
March 18, 2009, 12:42:02 AM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
While you stand on your high and mighty pedestal, I would like to point out that you called me a liar, but you neglected to give any details about that.
Ashley | 03.18.09 - 12:39 am 
 
?????????
 
I won't point out that you're calling me a high and mighty pedestal stander onner, but if you would like to point out that I called you a liar, please by all means, go right ahead. Details are optional, but at least show what I said you're basing your claim on.
 
Much ado.......?????
March 18, 2009, 8:22:10 AM EDT – Like – Reply


SteveMG
In the David Shuster vs. Erickson skirmish.
 
It's important to note that Shuster wants Erickson to reveal his (Erickson's) sources because they "burned him" with bad information.
 
This is the same Shuster who for 3 months kept reporting that his "sources" told him that Rove was going to be indicted in the Fitzgerald investigation.
 
Shouldn't Shuster tell us his sources since they "burned" him. And his story is far more important than what a blogger claims on the internet.
 
Okay, Mr. Shuster. Who burned you with bad info?
March 18, 2009, 9:54:10 AM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
I won't point out that you're calling me a high and mighty pedestal stander onner, but if you would like to point out that I called you a liar, please by all means, go right ahead. Details are optional, but at least show what I said you're basing your claim on.
 
Much ado.......?????
vstol | 03.18.09 - 8:27 am | # 
 
Interesting response, tells me that perhaps you did not intend to call me a liar in your post from last week. Here it is:
 
Ashley,
 
Don't be so hard on yourself. I've seen you spinning without lying....and vice versa.
 
(the preceeding was a pre-emtive comment)
vstol | 03.08.09 - 9:33 pm | # 
 
The "vice versa" you say would be "Lying without spinning". I have no idea what the "pre-emptive comment" comment means, but since you added a smiley face, I was hoping that I was simply misunderstanding what you were trying to say. But now, seeing your comments to Haggis, it seems like I understand clearly.
March 18, 2009, 11:42:54 AM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
Ashley,
 
First and foremost, I would not, in any serious sense, call you a liar. I apologize for the confusion.
 
I remebered the comment but couldn't recall the context. I went back and found what I was responding to.
=-=-=-=
 
Let's see:
 
The foundation has an opportunity to raise a ton of money with the help of Bill O'Reilly who is volunteering his time.
 
The hounds are trying to stop the foundation from getting those funds.
 
It sure as hell is an attack on the foundation.
 
Even an ass kissing, low IQ, lying spinning douchebag like me can see that.
Ashley | 03.08.09 - 8:09 pm |
=-=-=-=
 
My "(the preceeding was a pre-emtive comment)" was a message aimed at a certain J$P commenter (PP) who I fully expected to come back at you with another ugly tirade; i.e.,
=-=-=-=
You and your gang of ass-kissers are a pack of lying, spinning douchebags, Koldys. You know damn well that it isn't an attack on the foundation yet you persist in lying through your teeth about it becuase trying to make Newshounds look bad is more important to you than the truth. I am not sending this for your audience of minus-IQ stooges because I know I am banned. This message is for YOU . I used to think you had at least some shred credibility, but not any more. Pig.
pegleg peggy | Homepage | 03.08.09 - 7:46 pm | # 
=-=-=-=
 
The main reason for my 03.17.09 - 7:04 pm comment to Haggis was to repeat his spelling of "loosing."
 
Make one wonder, just what is "the loosing end of an argument?"
 
Hope this helps clear up things. 
 
Best.
March 18, 2009, 2:28:01 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Ashley
vstol | 03.18.09 - 2:33 pm | # 
 
Thank you V, I completely misunderstood and appreciate the time you took to bring it all together, I apologize for the pedestal comment.
March 18, 2009, 2:51:06 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Cecelia
Well, I'm not so sure that you should call Pegleg Peggy's post "an angry tirade", Vstol.
 
Peggy is an advocate for rape victims and resents what she considers to be sexist treatment of a rape victim by Bill O'Reilly.
 
We may think that it's reasonable that O'Reilly would express frustration and horror at the fact that an intoxicated young woman decided to leave her car and seek help in the middle of the night, while dressed in club gear sure to attract attention on the street, but Peggy views this as blaming the victim.
 
I'm sure she feels that O'Reilly was not expressing horrified regret, but calling attention to a woman's sexuality in the course of a violence crime. Such a thing, if intended, is superfluous and hideously sexist and demeaning to women in general. 
 
Logically that concept would most certainly extend to any sort of sexist gender-based pronouncements, such as the ones that we see directed towards women on blog boards.
 
With these sorts of sexist insults the intent is not to rebut the opinions or tastes of a female opponent, it is to level sexually charged epithets that render women as sexual objects (tramps, sluts, etc) and to call attention to their sexuality above all other aspects of their individuality.
 
An example of such behavior would be to insult women by suggesting that cordial alliances stemming from mutual intellectual admiration are sexual liaisons where the female sex object is asking for it. That this sexualized object had intentionally put herself at the mercy of a man in order to be sexually subjugated. 
 
That is tactic meant to demean females, rape vicims or not.
 
Peggy would certainly have none of that. Her sense of logic and her consciousness of women's issues is far too enlightened for that anti-intellectual and neanderthal mentality.
 
You may not agree with Peggy, but you must believe that her motives do not stem merely from a desire to humiliate a political opponent at all cost (in this case-- talking head Bill O'Reilly).
 
No, her work has been to combat the mentality I describe, a mentality that has served to victimize women in genral and to further victimize rape victims. 
 
By all means, read Peggy's posts and just see just how seriously she holds to those principles she expounds.
March 18, 2009, 4:11:19 PM EDT – Like – Reply


vstol
Cecelia,
 
Excellent point. In taking a closer look at Peggy's comments, I see that I have seriously misjudged her.
 
http://forum.newshounds.us/viewtopic.php?t=26518&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=390
March 18, 2009, 6:56:45 PM EDT – Like – Reply


Cecelia
Cecelia,
 
Excellent point. In taking a closer look at Peggy's comments, I see that I have seriously misjudged her.
 
vstol | 03.18.09 - 7:01 pm | # 
 
Oh, yes. You'll find an abundance of examples of her deeply felt principles.
March 19, 2009, 2:04:05 AM EDT – Like – Reply